If a person is terminally ill, and there is nothing anyone can do for them, why would they have to suffer? The text I am focusing on is a very famous book called of mice and men. This book is about a time in the great depression where two friends are struggling to find jobs. The character Leonie, who has a learning disability, is always getting into trouble for things that he doesn’t realize are wrong. When Leonie crosses the line and accidentally kills a girl, George realizes that if Leonie is caught, he will either be sent to a mental hospital or he will be tortured.
Knowing what is truly best for Leonie, George shoots him. The author John Steinbeck is able to effectively convince the reader to accept is opinion by writing the book about a real life euthanasia situation rather than just assassinating isn’t murder. When the victim is seriously ill or a threat to the society they shall be put to sleep without breaking the law. It is better to end one life then let it suffer. It is wrong for one to suffer without intentionally doing something wrong.
These are some of the arguments that John Steinbeck is getting across in his book. It is hard to know if a life is worth living and when it isn’t, but can a pain and suffering so incomprehensible ever be worth living for? A child who has severe disabilities or an elderly person with a painful disease would not get any enjoyment out of their life. Should society really force them to endure such a hardship? Some people may argue that every one should have the right to live, but they often don’t know of the pain that these people go through.
Sometimes the quality of life is so bad that people have the right to be put to rest if they choose. For example, a once strong, healthy, happy person is just lying in a bed unable to move. Another issue in euthanasia is having to make a choice. Many people believe hat voluntary euthanasia is a form of suicide, but the definition of suicide is a person who takes their life due to depression. For depression, people can get help. But for people with painful disabilities it is beyond their control.
Some may argue that voluntary euthanasia is too bigger choice for someone to make, but shouldn’t people have the option to be put to rest with dignity by means of an injection rather than forms of suicide? For those that have more severe handicaps, sometimes they are incapable of understanding the situation, which makes it more difficult. Some consider involuntary euthanasia a type of murder, but murder is a crime committed against someone. If a person is severally in pain and unable to consent, then would the action of death be against the person, or would it be for the best?
There is also a terrible pressure from society. All the arguments against voluntary euthanasia can be used by society to form a terrible psychological pressure on people to continue living for years against their better judgment. One example of this pressure is the risky and painful methods that those who genuinely wish to die would themes need to use, such as hanging. There are other factors people often forget about euthanasia such as economic costs. There is a limit on human resources in the world, in some countries there is a serious shortage of hospital space.
The energy of doctors should be put on peoples lives that can be saved instead of a continued life of somebody who wants to die. This would increase the general quality of care, and would shorten waiting lists. It is also very hard on families do deal with not having the option of euthanasia. Instead of a memory of the person being happy and strong, they have a memory of the person lying there helpless, not able to feed homeless, get out of bed, or remember who they are.