Corporate Governance And Auditing Accounting Essay

Audited account fees and corporate administration are dealingss and many research workers provide this issue in their research. The survey is explicating the relation between corporate administration and audit fees paid by companies for scrutinizing. Simunic ( 1980 ) was started the determiner audit fees and published his survey on the US audit service market. The surveies besides carried out to analyze the relationship between the audit fees and corporate administration in developed economic systems ( O’Sullivan and Diacon, 1994 ; Peel and Clatworthy, 2006 ; Yatim at al.,2006 ) . Good corporate administration will cut down the hearer hazard appraisal and consequences with lower audit fees ( Yatim at al,2006 ) . Auditor will presume that their service reflects benefits of better administration particularly scrutinizing. The survey is peculiar position to research workers because the easiness to acquire the information of audit fees and corporate administration issues which unwrap in companies ‘ one-year studies. The revelation of information hearers ‘ wage provides us the chance to supply extra grounds on the findings of audit fees. From the literature reappraisal, the dealingss to scrutinize fees amongst are the manager wage, size of the companies, complexness and hazard, board composing and size, the figure of board meeting and audit commission meeting during the fiscal twelvemonth and position of audit house.

The public accounting profession has been widely criticized during the past decennary for neglecting to protect investor involvements. While much of the audit profession performed laudably during this clip period, the failures monumental: Enron, WolrdCom, and Global Crossing. The new statute law, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, basically changed the auditor-client relationship and moved the procedure of puting audit criterions from the private sector to the populace sector. However, the failures that occurred were non entirely attributable to failures in the audit profession. They besides represented the bosom of organizations- failures of the corporate administration construction.

Corporate Governance and Auditing

The failures of the past decennaries represented failures across all parts of the corporate administration construction. They were merely non audit failures or merely direction failures. Every portion the system failed – at least to some extent in some organisations – from direction, to hearers, board of managers, self-regulatory organisations such as AICPA and FASB, regulative bureaus such as the SEC, loaning establishments, security analysts and stock exchanges. The research worker will look further on alterations impacting the audit profession and understand how the audit profession fits into the overall corporate administration[ 1 ]construction.

The Malayan Corporate Governance ( MCG ) Index 2009 has highlighted the demand for corporate to boards to better corporate administration patterns in the organisations.[ 2 ]The domestic policy failings, hapless hazard direction and limited investing hazard direction engineering are highlighted as a part to the economic system falls ( IMF, 1999 ; World Bank 1998 ) . After the Asiatic Financial Crisis, 1997, the quality of corporate administration becomes a concerned to pull investors ‘ assurance. In Malaysia, the chief beginnings of corporate administration reform docket are from the Malaysia Code on Corporate Government by Finance Committee on Corporate Governance, Capital Market Plan by Securities Commission and Financial Sector Master Plan by Bank Negara Malaysia on the fiscal sector. It serves the guideline on the best pattern of corporate administration and provides the way for the executions. The function of external hearer is portion of the reform activities that can ease good administration.

The audit activity serves as a monitoring device and therefore is portion of the corporate administration mechanism. Harmonizing to N. O’Sullivan ( 1994 ) , an built-in portion of the fiscal coverage procedure is a statutory audit which provides independent confirmation of corporate revelations. He farther cited that hearers are unambiguously placed to measure the quality of corporate administration since the hearer ‘s liability exposure suggests that its position of a company ‘s administration quality is reflected in the monetary value charged for the audit. Therefore, external audit has an of import function in reexamining and lending to the bureau ‘s control construction ( Barrett, 2007 )[ 3 ]. Malayan Code on Corporate Governance ( Revised 2007 ) stated that external hearer should independently describe to the stockholders in conformity with the statutory and professional demand and independently guarantee the board on the discharge of its duties. It besides regards hearer as the external force responsible for good corporate administration. On the other manus, the rules of corporate administration by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development ( OECD ) define external hearer should be accountable to the stockholders and owe a responsibility to the company to exert due professional attention in the audit behavior.

The listing demand of Bursa Malaysia issued in January, 2001, for illustration provides greater duty of public listed companies to heighten Malaysia ‘s corporate administration government. It besides outlines the demand for fiscal coverage revelation on corporate administration affairs. Therefore, this survey will supply the general thoughts of corporate administration construction and research whether the assorted best patterns and recommendation on corporate administration have influenced external audit fees.

Problem Statement

In a recent twelvemonth, the hearers ‘ function in corporate administration has been widely discussed. The quality of corporate administration affected hearers ‘ determination doing whether to tie in with peculiar client. Corporate administration is about how an organisation is manage, its corporate and other constructions, its civilizations, its policies and the manner it deals with assorted stakeholders ( Barrett,1997 ) companies with stronger internal administration constructions besides seem to bring forth more dependable fiscal statement and ensuing in decrease in the job of hearers. The usage of audit services is to supply assurance and credibleness of the information receive ( particularly fiscal statement ) by the user such as stockholders, bankers, creditors, authorities governments, investors, fiscal analysts and public. User assurance in the fiscal statement can be described into independency in fact and independency in visual aspect. The hearers have to keep an indifferent attitude in executing their work ( independency in fact ) and to be perceived by users as being independent ( independency in visual aspect ) . By and large, the more independent hearer perceived by the populace, the greater is the chance that user will hold assurance in his plants and sentiments.

Meeting with the cardinal stakeholders may assist the hearer in understanding their concern and cardinal conformity issues that will impact the behavior of the audit. Both hearers and client have to negociate audit fees that are reciprocally agree by themselves before execute the audit work. Price dialogue is non an easy undertaking because hearer frequently fined the fees inadequate to cover the cost incurred while client wish to pay every bit small as possible. The understanding procedure stimulated clients to do attempt to minimise governable hazards and thereby cut down audit cost. It besides helps hearers to grok their place and hence be able to negociate a just compensation for services rendered. On the other manus, there are instances were audit fees are manipulated by top direction to act upon hearers ‘ nonsubjective sentiments and study ( Sandra and Patrick, 1996 ) . Since the audit fees are negotiated between hearer and the board of managers, it may elicit the populaces ‘ uncertainty on the independency of hearers. There may be a via media between the direction and hearer for the latter to describe on the contrary to the fact in the return for higher audit fees.

This paper provides the audit fees construction which relates to the administration patterns by listed companies. The recommendation and compulsory administration patterns may act upon the dialogue of external audit fees. Corporate size is one of the traditional determiners of audit fees and has been considered as the most important and consistent explanatory variable across all old surveies ( Jie Low, 2008 ) . The entire assets of the company which is shown in the balance sheet can be used as a measuring and index of the company wealth and size. It is portion of the indispensable factors in finding the external audit fees. In general, auditor wage is based on clip cost footing where hearers are paid based on the clip they spent to make the field works. The hearer demand to pass longer tome to verify immense dealing of big companies and hence leads to higher audit fees.

In covering with daily operation, the concern widely exposed to the hazard which is natural portion of the concern activities. Audit hazard is accents as one of the cardinal construct in the procedure of audit and audit fees finding. For case, hearers are engage with battle hazard that may lose their repute, inability of the client to pay the audit fees, judicial proceeding and fiscal loss. In finding the corporate hazard, external hearer demand to hold a better and sufficient apprehension of the client concern such as client ‘s operating environment, ordinance, direction aims, schemes and internal control. A corporation which is considered hazardous was expected to run the hazard of audit failure. However, it is widely accepted that audit hazard is hard and subjective to mensurate straight and accurately. Therefore, different placeholders have been used to mensurate the hazard associated with the client such as acerb trial ratio, liquidness ratio, speedy ratio, pitching ratio, loss sustained in the old twelvemonth, loss sustained in the current twelvemonth and corporate age.

Ample surveies have attempted to place the relationship between hearer size and audit fees. The survey is to clear up whether there is a higher audit fee is charged by Big-4 audit houses compared with Non Big-4 audit houses. Auditor ‘s study particularly produced by the Big-4 audit house[ 4 ], plays as an effectual mechanism in corporate administration because they have a dominant power in many audit markets. Their repute influence the quality of the service provided. Therefore, big companies prefer to cover with the large international audit house to guarantee the populace of audit quality minimise bureau cost ( Zulkarnain , 2008 ) . However, there is no conclusive grounds to province the relationship between the position of the audit house and the monetary value of external hearers.

The complexness of the concern ( either fiscal or non-financial step ) may take to ahiher audit fees. Many anterior surveies on audit pricing theoretical account have indicated that complexness variable has been used extensively ( Cameran, 2005 ; Chan et Al. ; 1993 ; Clatworthy and Peel, 2006 ; Simunic, 1980 ; O’Keefe et al. , 1994 ; Joshi & A ; Al-Bastaki, 2000 ; Zulkarnain et. al. , 2008 ) . From the non-financial point of positions, figure of entire subordinates and foreign subordinates, locations, and figure of industries the concern operates are frequently cited as the placeholders of complexness.

The company is led by the board of managers who is elected by the stockholders and has a fiducial responsibility duty to protect stockholders involvements. Coles et al. , 2001 stated that the board has the responsibility to do certain that the top direction is acting in a manner that will supply the optimum value for stockholder. In Malaysia, the Torahs regulating the composing of board of managers are Companies Act 1965, the listing demand of Bursa Malaysia ( once known as Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange ) amended release January 2001 and the Malaysia Code on Corporate Governance ( revised 2007 ) . The codification outlined that the effectual board balance should do up of at least one tierce of independent non-executive managers. The term independent as prescribed by the listing demand and the Malayan Governance Code refers to independence from direction and important stockholders. The board should run into on a regular basis and the Numberss of meeting in a twelvemonth together with manager ‘s attending should be disclosed. The more persevering boards measured by the Numberss of meeting in a twelvemonth are likely to be negative associated with external audit fees.

The Malayan Code on Corporate Governance besides requires the Director ‘s wage should be appreciable and should reflect the duty and committedness of the managers. The inducements of top direction have been characterized as an of import mechanism of corporate administration as it assures the alliance of the direction and the stockholders involvement. It besides serves as a mechanism for deciding the struggle of involvement among the directors and stockholders. Director wage is really much related to the bureau theory which provides the suited wage to the manager as inducements to advance corporate aims and guarantee long term corporate public presentation. Where wage is based on public presentation, the external hearer is expected to undergo intensive testing of corporate history to verify public presentation steps and therefore the audit fees will be increased.

Research Aims

The general intent of this survey is to research and place whether the assorted best patterns and recommendations on corporate administration have influenced external audit fees in Malaysia listed companies in Bursa Malaysia for the fiscal twelvemonth 2011. This survey will be more descriptive to place specific nonsubjective as follows:

To determine the relationship between external audit fees ( dependent variable ) and corporate administration construction ( independent variable ) among the companies listed on the chief board of the Bursa Malaysia.

To understand the differences in audit pricing schemes of companies with different size, naming demand and internal administration construction.

To supply some preliminary grounds that external audit fees is determined by the factor of corporate size, corporate hazard, audit house position, complexness of the house, board diligence, manager wage and board composing.

Significant of the Study

A ample figure of surveies have examined the relationship between audit monetary value theoretical account and corporate administration features in developed economic systems. The attack of the survey will let us to understand the differences in audit pricing schemes of Malayan listed companies with the different corporate size and hazard, complexness of the corporation, audit house size, and internal administration variables ( i.e. board size, figure of board meeting and manager ‘s wage ) . The grounds provided from this survey will lend to steer other future research related to the survey of audit monetary value theoretical account. This will further widen the organic structure of literature signifier different positions. Finally, the grounds presented in this survey will help the audit house, listed companies and besides private companies to negociate audit fees that are reciprocally agree to them.

Organization of the Study

This survey is divided into five chapters. Chapter one provides the research background, job statement, research aims and the important of the survey. Chapter two outlines the background to scrutinizing and accounting in Malaysia, Malaysia concern environment and Malayan corporate administration environment. This chapter besides presents the relevant literature reappraisal of anterior research workers which highlights the issue of corporate administration construction and its relationship with the external audit fees. Chapter three discusses on the research methodological analysis that is employed in obtaining the information from the sample of public listed companies and the statistical used to analyse the information. Chapter four reports the empirical consequence and discusses the determination of the survey. Finally, chapter five provides the decisions, restrictions to the survey and some suggestions for future research.


Since most of the old surveies merely focus on the audit monetary value theoretical account which was introduced by Simunic in 1980, this survey will supply the relationship between the external audit fees and the variable that represent the administration construction in Malayan public listed companies such as manager ‘s composing, manager ‘s wage, board composing, board diligence and other variable such as position of the audit house, complexness of the corporation, corporate size and corporate hazard.