Financial Performance Of Travis Perkins Plc Accounting Essay

The company ‘s fiscal statements will be concerned with the entity ‘s public presentation over a period of clip and how that public presentation compares or is benchmarked against that attained by rivals over the same period. The footing for these judgements and comparings will be achieved by using accounting ratio analysis. Calculating fiscal accounting ratios involves reading and analysis of the fiscal statements by set uping, analyzing and comparing the consequences in order that users may do their determinations.

Ratio analysis:

Financial ratio analysis is the computation and comparing of ratios which are derived from the information in a company ‘s fiscal statements.

A fiscal ratio can give a fiscal analyst an first-class image of a company ‘s state of affairs and an analysis of the fiscal ratios over a period of clip would supply information about the alterations in the company ‘s public presentation.


For the twelvemonth 2008:

Profitability ratios:

Tax return on capital employed ( without Exceptional Items )= Net Net income before revenue enhancement and involvement * 100/ Capital Employed= 202.5*100/2243.7 = 9.025Tax return on capital employed ( Exceeding Items )= Net Net income before revenue enhancement and involvement * 100/ Capital Employed= 146.3*100/2243.7 = 6.52Tax return on assets ( without Exceptional Items )= Net income before revenue enhancement and involvement *100/Total Assetss= 202.

5*100/2891.4 = 7.003Tax return on assets ( without Exceptional Items )= Net income before revenue enhancement and involvement *100/Total Assetss= 146.3*100/2891.

4 = 5.06Asset Turnover= Revenue * 100/Assets= 3178.6*100/2891.4 = 109.

9Gross Net income= Gross Profit * 100/Revenue= 1098.3*100/3178.6 = 34.6Net Net income= Net net income before involvement and revenue enhancement * 100/Revenue= 202.

5*100/3178.6 = 6.37

Efficiency ratios:

Debtors collection period= Trade receivables * 365/Revenues or Gross saless= 386.2*365/3178.6 = 44.3 DayssCreditors ‘ period= Trade payables x 365 /Cost of Gross saless or Purchases= 582.

2*365/2080.3 = 102.2 yearssInventories Turnover= Average or Closing inventories*365/Cost of gross revenues or Grosss= 321.9*365/2080.3 = 56.5 yearss

Liquidity ratios:

Current ratio or Working Capital= Current assets/Current liabilities= 718.

2/647.7 = 1.1Quick or Acid Test ratio= Current assets -inventories/Current liabilities= ( 718.2-321.9 ) /647.7 = 0.


Gearing / solvency ratio:

Gearing= Fixed Interest Capital* 100/Capital employed= 10073.3*100/2243.7 = 44.9The same computations were followed for the twelvemonth 2007 and resulted in the undermentioned tabular array.

Performance of analysis:

The following tabular array describes the sum-up of the public presentation analysis of the company for two fiscal old ages 2007 & A ; 2008SL.NOAnalysisThe groupFor twelvemonth 2008 without Exceeding ItemsFor twelvemonth 2008 with Exceeding ItemsFor twelvemonth 2007 without Exceeding ItemsFor twelvemonth 2007 with Exceeding Items1ProfitablenessTax return on capital employed9.0256.5211.

6511.65Tax return on assets7.0035.069.

0409.040Assetss turnover109.9109.

9114.2114.2Gross net income34.634.

634.534.5Net net income6.376.378.228.222EfficiencyDebtors ( receivables ) aggregation period44.

3 yearss44.3 yearss48.3 yearss48.3 yearssCreditors/ Payables period102.

2 yearss102.2 yearss102.3 yearss102.

3 yearssInventories Turnover56.5 yearss56.5 yearss57.7 yearss57.7 yearss3LiquidCurrent or Working Capital1.

11.111Quick or Acid Test ratio0.60.60.50.


Summary of company public presentation:

When comparing the analysis of two finanacial old ages we get the undermentioned consequences


The profitableness ratios indicate that the net income border of the company has decreased from 2007 to 2008. This is reflected in the net net income border being reduced from 8.22 % in 2007 to 6.

4 % in 2008. The return on captial employed and the net net income is reduced in 2008 which could be attributed to the addition in selling and administrative disbursals of the company.


The efficiency of the company has the same rate of public presentation in both the twelvemonth except the receivables aggregation period which gets reduced and this consequences in decreased hard currency operating rhythm for the company.

The decrease in receivables collection period might hold been achieved by either stricting the aggregation methods or giving price reductions for early payments for clients. At the same clip the company must pay attending to the hazard associated with stricter aggregation which in some instances will impact the hereafter gross by taking to decrease of clients due to the rigorous regulations or the clients will anticipate the offers even with that of the rivals.


The liquidness public presentation is marginally higher in 2008 compared to 2007 which could be attributed to the decrease in the recievables aggregation period.


The geartrain of the company is somewhat increased in 2008. This is due to borrowing of loan as reflected in the balance sheet of the twelvemonth 2008.

Recommendation and Restrictions:

From the ratio analysis it could be reiterated that the company could concentrate on cut downing it ‘s administrative and merchandising disbursals therby increasing its cyberspace net income. From the cashflow position, the company should pull off its cash-flow in the optimal degree while non adversely implementing rigorous aggregation and late payment processs.

If these steps are employed for pull offing the working capital demands so it would so this would take to decreased gross in future and increased force per unit area from providers thereby impacting the hereafter cashflows.



Formulas used:

Cash in-flows:

Cash gross revenues per month = hard currency sales*selling price*.95 [ 5 % price reduction ]= 100*400*.95 =3800 per monthCash receivables = recognition gross revenues before 2 months*selling monetary value= 100*400 =400, 00 for 7th month

Cash out-flows:

Material purchased = entire measure produced before 2 months *cost ofMaterials= 1200*200 =240, 00 for 7th monthLabour payment =total measure produced * direct labor cost= 1200*40 =480, 00 for 5th month

Variable production

Over Head [ OH ] cost = ( entire measure produced * production OH cost * 0.

7 ) + ( entire measure produced in old month * production OH cost *0.3 )= ( 1400*20*0.7 ) + ( 1200*20*0.

3 ) =26800 for 6th month


Cash influx

5th month In ?

6th month In ?

7th month In ?

8th month In ?

9th month In ?

tenth month In ?

11th month In ?

12th month In ?

1Cash gross revenues380038003800380038003800380038002Cash receivables

4000004800005600006400007200008000003Scarp gross revenues



SL. No

Cash escape

5th month

In ?

6th month In ?

7th month In ?

8th month In ?

9th month In ?

tenth month In ?

11th month In ?

12th month In ?

1Cash for stuff purchased

2400002800003200004000004800005200002Cash paid for labor480005600064000800009600010400096000880003Variable OH payment

268003080037600456005080049200452004Distribution, disposal cost60000600006000060000600006000060000600005Income revenue enhancement


6Fixed assets purchase



Q 2b ) BREAK-EVEN Points

Formula used:

Contribution per unit = merchandising monetary value per unit – entire variable cost per unitBreak even quantity = entire fixed cost/ part per unitBreakeven point in gross = breakeven point in units X merchandising monetary value


For 6th month

Fixed costs = 60,000Contribution unit = 400 – 260 =?140Breakeven point = 60000/140 = ?428.57Breakeven point in gross = 428.57 X 400 = ?171428

For 8th month

Depreciation = 1333Fixed cost = 60,000 + 1333 =61,333Contribution unit = 400 – 260 =?140Breakeven point = 61,333/ 140 = ?438.1Breakeven point in gross = 438.1 X 400 = ?175240


Fringy cost comprehensive income statement for the period months 7-12Revenues/Turnover ( months 7-12 ) ?48, 68,000Less variable costs ( ?34, 32,000 )Contribution ?14, 36,000Less fixed costs ( ?3, 65,333 )Net net income ?10, 70,667Entire Credit gross revenues = 11600 X 400= 46, 40,000Entire hard currency gross revenues = 38000 X 6= 2, 28,000Entire gross for periodCalendar months 7-12 = Total recognition gross revenues + Entire hard currency gross revenues= 46, 40,000 + 2, 28,000= 48, 68,000Entire fixed cost = Fixed cost + Depreciation= 3, 60,000 + 5333= 3, 65,333Variable cost for periodCalendar months 7 -12 = Total figure of units produced*variable cost per unit= 13,200 Tens 260= 34, 32,000

Q 2d ) Net income Prognosis

The company has expanded its fabrication unit ‘s norm of 3000 per month by the geting the new fabrication plus for ? 80,000, by this information the net income prognosis is calculated below


Let us see the month 7,Entire no. of units = 3000

Entire gross

Entire gross =1200000 [ 3000*400 ]

Entire gross =?1200000

Entire cost of gross revenues:

Entire Cash for stuff purchased = 600,000 [ 3000*200 ]Entire Cash paid for labour = 120,000 [ 3000*40 ]Entire Variable OH payment = 60,000 [ 3000*20*0.

7 ) + ( 3000*20*0.3 ]

Entire cost of gross revenues =?780,000


Gross net income =?420,000

Entire non-production costs

Entire Distribution,Administration cost = 60,000 [ given ]Income revenue enhancement =15,000 [ 180,000/12 ]Entire depreciation =1333.33 [ ( 80,000/5 ) /12 ]

Entire non-production costs =?76333.33

Therefore,Net Net income = Gross net income – entire non productioncost=420000-76333.33

Net income =?343666.67

In my point of position, harmonizing to above net income forecast the company ‘s program of spread outing is profitable to the company ; anyhow at the initial phase of this enlargement, the company wants to increase its bank overdraft, because the company wants to keep its hard currency flow as hazard less procedure or to cut down the insolvency. Another manner for maintain the hard currency flow is the company wants to increase its hard currency gross revenues per month.

I put these suggestions because the company decided to hold all the 3000 units as recognition gross revenues it action will increase the solvency hazard by holding improper hard currency flow.

Q3 ) MANAGEMENT Accounting

“ Corporate direction accounting systems are unequal for today ‘s environment ” .


This essay describes critical treatment about the statement “ Corporate direction accounting systems are unequal for today ‘s environment ” ( Johnson & A ; S.Kaplan, 1987 ) .

In general, Business has changed dramatically since 1930.A Accounting has non changed at all since that clip! A A We need to travel off from traditional Cost Accounting.A A ” Cost Accounting is enemy figure one of productiveness ” ( Goldratt & A ; Cox, 1992 )

Management accounting

Companies get downing to implement a thin scheme frequently complain that they do good things in operations, such as addition productiveness and cut down stock list, but it shows up as a negative in the company ‘s fiscal statements. Many comptrollers have been frustrated by the meaningless information generated by a criterion cost system.The complexness of our bing systems driven by the unbelievable figure of minutess that company ‘s procedure in an effort to capture informations at the smallest increase possible. Companies are treating 1000000s of minutess through their concern systems. Since those minutess are a important beginning of information for the fiscal statements, comptrollers want to guarantee that they are processed in a manner that is complete and accurate.

All of this is driven by the combination of MRP systems and standard cost accounting systems. The other important complexness is the traditional accent within the accounting community on conformity instead than betterment. This state of affairs has been exacerbated by the conformity demands ( Johnson & A ; S.

Kaplan, 1987 ) .In order to do reasonable determinations refering the merchandise which they market, the directors need to cognize what their merchandise cost is. The merchandise design and determinations for new merchandises debut will be influenced by the awaited cost and profitableness of the merchandise.

The cumulative consequence of determinations on merchandise design, debut, support and pricing helps specify the house ordaining scheme. This scheme will be successful if the extra cost caused by bring forthing and functioning is less than the economic sciences of graduated table. If the cost system fails to mensurate distinction cost decently so the house might take to compare in a section where these cost are excessively high. ( J.Bruns, 1987 )Many organisation or companies now identified that they are utilizing unequal cost systems in today ‘s high competition. They find that the intentional system is to value the stock list cost for fiscal and revenue enhancement statements are non giving the accurate and timely information for today ‘s directors to advance the operations expeditiously and to mensurate merchandise cost ( Kaplan, 1988 ) .

For an illustration, one chemical company ‘s system did a occupation of gauging its full merchandise cost but it ca n’t be used for cost control. Since it gathered all merchandise cost at each production phase and cumulatively absorbed all discrepancies along the trail. While the system reported existent cost for all merchandises its does non supply any information in cost decrease attempts for directors. ( Kaplan, 1988 )As the competition shifted from low-priced production of merchandises the company needs to develop new cost system to give more information about the merchandise efficiency to the directorsThe concern universe has merely increased the velocity and force per unit area. With this in head, see the luckless comptrollers ; they studied the Numberss and theories, exhausted money on schools to larn an honorable profession, merely to be viewed as miserable bean counters-dull persons trailing debits and credits with no better cognition of the larger concern than any other employee.

They chase minutess ; have bosom onslaughts over isolated bills. This is non why they went to college. The deep-rooted wonts of most concerns have even reinforced the state of affairs. The main fiscal officer, who tries to encompass alteration, utilizing engineering to manage the more everyday occupations and liberating himself to go a better concern spouse and adviser, frequently encounters opposition. Fiscal executives are frustrated.

And their concerns are non acquiring what they need. ( fiume, 2003 )DecisionAs increasing planetary competition, economic recession and a new focal point on quality and client service have led to a turning concern in the professional and academic accounting literature, Predicting alteration in direction accounting systems with new merchandise bing systems, strategic cost analysis methods, quality direction, and a host of other techniques and methods that are new or are claimed to be new. The advantages for organisations by following new direction accounting techniques are alterations occurred in those systems that support determination devising and alterations occurred in directing systems, those used for honoring performance.A Organizational size, construction and strength of competition did non predict alterations in direction accounting systems ( Theresa & A ; John, 1996 ) .