In mostly been characterized by patterns of creation

In this article, Dissanayake
argues that human behavior in regards to art
is based on patterns or syndromes of
creation and response which acts as sources of pleasure, all of which are
hallmarks of biological adaptations. The author adopted this view after
realizing that human beings make different types of artworks by applying certain processes, formalization, repetition,
elaboration, exaggeration, and manipulation of expectations (Dissanayake, 1980).
She notes that over the years, adoption of different art behaviors has enabled
man to enhance survival skills by reinforcing a sense of community,
interdependence as well as cooperation and hence it became an important part of our daily lives. She
maintains that ordinary day to day life
can be formless or meaningless, but when shaped and embellished or transformed
as art in the form of rituals or play, it tends to have a more significant of greater meaning and reality by making it more
coherent and aesthetic. When we feel certain aspects of life or objects to be aesthetic, we tend to recognize it more and
feel coherent, which forms an important
aspect of our daily lives. Art is essential to the fullest realization of man’s
human nature, and she indeed notes that people make art so that aspects of life
which they care about become special and
uplifted from the ordinary to extraordinary.

 I find this article to be very informative and
interesting. I agree with most of the
author’s ideas regarding the nature of human behavior towards art and the fact
that the propensity to make and enjoy art inevitably draws on the part of man’s
universal and biological nature. This is
evidenced by the fact that human behavior in regards to making and
appreciation of art has mostly been
characterized by patterns of creation and response that act as sources
of pleasure. Art is closely associated
with ritual and play, all of which are aimed at making life special. Dissanayake’s
ideas of art behavior provide a deeper understanding of existing knowledge
about man’s nature and its relation to art. By considering art as a way of
making ordinary extraordinary, Dissanayake proposes the idea that art is man’s
way of bringing a higher significance to life. I found this article to be very
interesting and informative as it allowed me to gain a deeper understanding of
why humans have and still “do art.”