This cultural response essay will discourse my trip to the Museum of Fine Arts in Houston. I will be depicting my favourite plants of art, compare two pieces of art by Do Ho Suh, and so depict my experience at the museum.The first portion of the museum that I visited was the Audrey Jones Beck edifice on degree 1.
The exhibit was the Antiquities and American Art 1800-1970. I saw art given by Ima Hogg, Jackson Pollock, Severin Roesen, Louis Comfort Tiffany and Christian Edward Bottcher. I have visited the Hogg Plantation and being able to see the furniture and art that was given by Mrs. Hogg from her place was really interesting. The first piece of art that caught my attending was in subdivision 107 of this degree.
It was called the “ Victorian Bouquet ” by the creative person Severin Roesen in circa 1850-1855. Roesen was an American creative person but was born in Germany in 1815. The media of the graphics is oil on canvas. The “ Victorian Bouquet ” features a broad assortment of keen flowers and fruit. It revives the seventeenth century Dutch tradition of still-life portrayals and pictures. The picture celebrates wealth, life, and aesthetic and physical comfort. It contains roses, poppies, forenoon glorifications, paeonies, tulips, mouse ears, clove pinks, lilies, flags, Prunus persicas, raspberries, Punica granatums, and a glass of vino among other things.
Roesen provides a banquet for the senses. What I love most about this work is how graphic, realistic, and beautiful he made the flowers and contents of the image. The bright and rich colourss chosen in contrast to the black background truly make a beautiful scene.The 2nd graphics that I was impressed with was created by Louis Comfort Tiffany, who created the Tiffany lamps. This piece was in the same edifice but in subdivision 109. He was an American creative person and developed Tiffany Studios in 1900.
The name of the piece is “ A Wooden Landscape in Three Panels ” created around 1905. The medium is glass, copper-foil, and lead. “ A Wooden Landscape ” is far more complex than any stained glass Windowss I have seen, which are normally put together like a mystifier.
Normally they are layered together in multiple pieces with glass, one on top of the other. This is merely like a painter layered his pigment of a canvas. Tiffany used elusive picks of colour in this graphics which changes with the fluctuations of visible radiation that it has been exposed to. Like a life landscape, this graphics alterations in visual aspect responding to the visible radiation environing it.
The thing that caught my attending about this graphics was the size. Its overall size is 7.2 ten 11 pess. Another thing that I liked about this graphics was that it was stained glass.
I love stained glass Windowss and how Tiffany did this was gorgeous. My pa has collected Tiffany lamps and so when I saw this graphics I recognized the styling and technique rapidly.The Third portrayal I found was in the same edifice as the other two but in subdivision 113. The creative person who created the work was Christian Edward Bottcher. Bottcher was a German creative person who lived from 1818 to 1889. The name of the graphics was “ Summer Night on the Rhine ” which was created in 1862.
The medium of the work was oil pigment on canvas. It contained mediaeval palaces, picturesque towns, friends gathered under a beautiful tree, and a vinery inclining down the side of a hill. The Rhine vale is an highly romantic scene which was captured absolutely in this graphics where there is an exciting, charming, and nostalgic get-together. Laughter and felicity spill from the canvas and it makes you desire to be a portion of the jubilation. The moonlight sets the perfect tailing and colourss to reflect the temper of the picture. What I found to be capturing about this scene is how all 15 or so work forces are seeking to tribunal the adult females and are giving them flowers.
It is about like an highly big match-maker party. Another fun thing about this image is where the party is taking topographic point. You can rapidly state that they are all from the upper category because of their frock and the palace that they are beside, but the party is under a large tree with a table underneath. A pendant is tied to a limb of a tree with rope. This is a really keen oil picture and I sat and wondered at its item for a really long while.In the Caroline Wiess Law edifice, 2nd floor, gallery 200, I found the plants of Do Ho Suh, a Korean creative person life in America.
The first piece I found was called “ Fallen Star 1/5 ” which is 131 ten 145 ten 120 inches. It was created in 2008-2009 and is made up of ABS ( plastic ) , linden, beech, ceramic, enamel pigment, glass, honeycomb board, lacquer pigment, latex pigment, LED visible radiations, pinewood, plyboard, rosin, spruce, cinnamene, polycarbonate sheets and polyvinyl chloride sheets. The 2nd piece of art created by Suh is called “ Home within a Home ” which was created in 2009. The dimensions of this piece are 131 ten 145 x300 inches. It was created with rosin. Make Ho Suh began utilizing nylon and silk to make full size representations of his childhood place in Korea and his first American Apartment, a historical edifice in Providence, Rhode Island. The semitransparent quality of these stuffs creates the bleary line between the past and present, indoors and outside. “ Fallen Star 1/5 ” is an autobiographical representation of Suh ‘s journey from Korea to the U.
S. The graphics shows us a traditional Korean bookman ‘s house that has crashed into the edifice that housed his first American flat. Each object in the house has been manus made by Suh. He made the house and its contents every bit realistic as possible to make the consequence of being lived in and something the spectator can associate to. “ Home within a Home ” is a continuance of the piece “ Fallen Star ” .
In the earlier work, the two edifices were really much separate entities but in “ Home within a Home ” , the Korean house and the flat edifice have become a portion of the same entity, turning and organizing together as one. Suh ‘s graphics is non seeking to convey the thought of a violent hit between civilizations, but instead about how they coexist together. He said possibly “ If you start to travel things around, possibly the Korean house loses its individuality, kind of blends in with the American style-or the other manner around. I would love to construct a house like this because it raises really interesting inquiries. Are you in a Korean house or an American house? That ‘s a changeless inquiry to myself ” ( MFAH description of graphics ) .
Both pieces of art typify the destroyed Old Korea coming together with the unifying New Korea and America. Both pieces of art are easy to compare because of their connexion that was created by the creative person. Both represent the narrative and journey of Do Ho Suh. They both show what “ place ” agencies to him and how he puts importance on his civilization.
The lone large difference between the pieces is the stuffs used and the fact that “ Fallen Star ” they are two different houses, and in “ Home within a Home ” they are put together and morphing into one house. My favourite out of the two is “ Fallen Star 1/5 ” because of how realistic it was. It took him 2 old ages to make this chef-d’oeuvre and it is so astonishing. I love how each room is made to look lived in and creates this warm, at place ambiance. On the exterior of the edifice he uses an old manner of architecture that I love and it was put together really elaborately. There was a adult female who was giving a circuit to a in-between school group and she described the graphics to them by comparing it to The Wizard of Oz. She did this because of how the Korean place is crashed into the flat edifice. I thought this was humourous and helped the kids relate more to the picture, “ We ‘re non in Kansas any longer! ” The one thing I found interesting about “ Home within a Home ” was the stuff used, rosin.
Merely staring at the piece, you could see right through it and could see every item of the stairwaies, hallways, Windowss, and the roof of the Korean house while still being really detailed on the exterior. Both pieces by Do Ho Suh were really interesting and thought arousing. I would urge any of my category mates to travel see them both every bit shortly as possible.My experience at the Museum was really gratifying and I hope to travel at that place once more really shortly.
I drove at that place with my ma which created a good bonding clip and made the experience even better for me. When we foremost entered Houston I was really confused about which constructing the Museum was a portion of and we ended up in the parking garage of the Houston Museum of Natural Science, oops! Once we figured out where we really needed to be, the right museum, we walked into the first room and were heartily greeted by the two adult females up front. I had a little, fun conversation with them both and they were highly interested in my assignment and asked me about it and what I planned to make. Once they looked over my assignment sheet they informed me that my entryway into the museum would be free of charge. That was highly nice of them to set that much importance into acquisition and wages pupils that manner! As my ma and I wandered aimlessly around the edifice taking in all there was to see, all of the employees greeted us and smiled. I noticed rapidly that all of them were from different states, largely Asia and one adult male was even from Africa.
While my ma and I walked about, we get turned around and confused as to where we were and every individual employee we asked to assist us was highly sort. I have already recommended many of my friends to travel visit this museum. The pieces of art I saw were astonishing and I love that an constitution like this is every bit close to me as Houston. This trip was a great experience but unluckily I did non hold the clip to remain and see all of the pieces and so I hope to travel once more really shortly.