Pros And Cons Of Internet Privacy Essay

A division Into two especially mutually exclusive r contradictory groups or entitles. Sentence: The debate between privacy versus security some claim to be a false dichotomy. Erode: to diminish or destroy by degrees. Sentence: New security tactics In the U. S. Erode Its own citizen’s privacy. Apartheid: Racial segregation; specifically: a former policy of segregation and political and economic discrimination against non- European groups in the republic of South Africa. Sentence: To this day apartheid is maintained in South Africa to minimize terrorism among other races.

Today’s innovative technology has helped all of us awhile also diminishing our utter privacy. We order things online, computers save history, credit cards are swiped, and our smartness monitor our every move. After the 9/1 1 terrorist bombings the U. S. Security became more solidified descending our privacy which now seems nonexistent. Privacy is vital as a human being and shouldn’t be restrained because as Americans we would be undermining our own constitution. The simple Idea of someone looking thru my bedroom or even notebook can give me disturbed feelings.

We Will Write a Custom Essay about Pros And Cons Of Internet Privacy Essay
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Feelings are Important and can generate drastic actions fueled by these emotions and the government knows that. Which Is why they use the words such as terrorists, bombers, and ISIS to promote fear, terror, and anxiety upon its citizens. The fact that we now practically have no privacy is unjustifiable because the government security claims it’s for our wellbeing and safety. How can we be well and feel safe being watched 24 hours a day and 7 days a week? To the point where we even start thinking our own neighbors or people next to us in the bus can be terrorists.In the Huffing post article “Privacy vs.. Security? Privacy.

” Marc Rottenest writes “.. BenJamin Franklin warned long ago that such a strategy would fail. The correct balance is not a metaphysical tradeoff between security and privacy. The correct balance really a counter-balance – is between the powers of government and the means of oversight that are established. This Is the point made clear by the 9-1 1 Commission. It Is the oversight of government and the sights of the Individuals that we are being asked to sacrifice, and no where Is the cost more clear than with privacy. We have a government for a reason and that is to establish justice and insure domestic tranquility.

Invading the whole nation’s privacy contradicts what our founding fathers visualized as the land of the free. The fourth amendment in the Bill of Rights clearly states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, purported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Although the fourth amendment doesn’t guarantee absolute privacy we are entitled to It. Politicians think that they should be allowed to Invade people’s privacy but why should they be allowed? When the government, Politician, and authoresses have not always been efficient and effective themselves. The government has authority to protect the public we a as the Americans citizens should make sure that they do not misuse their authority