Same-Sex Marriage – Persuasive Essay

Franklin It shootout matter if your straight, homosexual, transgender if you find happiness then you should be able to commits to that person with out extraction from the government. Same sex marriage should be legal for a many reasons such as the defined separation between religion and government, the benefits of marriage, and minority discrimination. The neo-Christian politicians are using religious arguments to establish that homosexuality is a disgrace. While this maybe their belief system, this country was founded on religious freedom, where the people are allowed to worship how they see fit.

A ground rule, set up from the beginning, states that separation needs to be made between religion and government, so the two shall never join and become a theocracy. Baker 1 )With the issue of gay marriage the lines get blurred and religion influences a government decision of who shall be married and who shall not be married. MOST religions do not agree to same-sex marriages that do not mean all religions don’t concur with them. By restricting same sex marriage the government is taking away from their rights to religion.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The best way to relate this is an example from the bible stating that if two people of the same-sex are in love then no person should be able to separate them, “what therefore God has joined together, let no man separate” (Mark 10:9). There are over 1 ,049 federal rights and also over 300 (depending on what state) rights that couples receive when they become married, many of these rights are denied to same-sex civil unions. The same financial benefits that apply to man and women married couples should apply to same-sex couples. All couples, homosexual or not, should be able to enjoy the benefits of marriage.

Why should a couple be denied joint ownership, medical decision- making, filing their taxes together, shared ownership of a property, and insurance benefits just because of sexual preference. It’s unfair to deny these reveilles to people because their relationship doesn’t fit the states definition of one. (Avery 1). America was founded on the concept that the majority should rule. Unfortunately this idea needed to be supported by another law protecting minorities. The Bill of Rights protects such minorities because in The United States we understand not everyone is going to have the same opinion.

The Bill of Rights also supports anti-slavery and equal protection amendments. Denying marriage to a homosexual couple is no different than denying marriage to Hispanic or black couples. Denying marriage to gay couples is arguable because all major religions consider homosexuality a sin but The First Amendment of the Constitution clearly states that a person’s religious views or lack of must be protected. Meaning marriage is a religious act and in being religious the law protects the people and gives them the decision to marry to the same sex. Avery 1 So unless someone is going to change the first amendment of the constitution the law is supposed to protect same sex marriage. Same-sex marriage has split the U. S. By age, political affiliations, religion, and geography. There are many people that oppose same- sex marriage for any reasons, religion, unsuitable life style, and also because it could weaken the definition of marriage. Some concerns are, that marriage is a sacred institution, and since churches don’t allow gay marriages, neither should the law.

Many gay and straight people regard marriage as sacred and view it from a religious perspective. But legal marriage is a function Of our government, and it’s the government’s responsibility to not impose one group’s religious beliefs on any citizen. In addition, what about faiths that do celebrate same- sex marriage, including some Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, and Unitarian congregations? We shouldn’t place a lower priority on their beliefs. Religion is so infinitely varied, especially in our country that presenting one group as the religious viewpoint makes no sense. Marriage is about procreation.

Many married couples raise children; some come from both parents, others may be conceived through egg or sperm donors, and some may be adopted or blended into a step family. The worth of a family isn’t based on whether the children are biologically related to both parents, any more than it’s based on whether the parents are gay or straight. Of course, not everyone is able to reproduce, or wants to, yet no one has suggested we prevent childless heterosexual couples from marrying. Ifs not K to be gay. This is something rarely spoken aloud in the mainstream by opponents of gay marriage.