The of the brain. The chips should be

The technology has a capability to evolve the entire mankind to highly intelligentspecies. However, the technology needs ethical analysis. The prominent ethicalconcerns are:1. Considering the scientific research and product development aspect ofthe technology, the chip is implanted to the most critical organ of the body, andextreme care has to be taken in the process of implanting. Human body acceptsor rejects any external implant is performed, furthermore, the rejection face wasobserved in several cases when implants were made on other organs. Whichinvokes high caution in the case of the brain. The chips should be non-toxic andsafe. Warranty and servicing issues of the chip have to be addressed.2. The technology will be like a wizard hat and will also give enormouspower to the brain, altering natural thoughts and natural behavioural instincts.This would also affect social life and relationship harmony.3. On introducing the product, the market price of the chip would bereally high, which makes it nearly impossible for common people to purchase it,however, the rich people who can afford now have higher supremacy because oftheir powerful brain which further broadens the gap between rich and poor. Sucha scenario of power concentration can also create autocracy. It would also lead toan unequal competition in education and research sectors.4. On interfacing, the personal identification with the internet also conjurethe probability of security breach or getting hacked. This also reduces thepersonal privacy which raises the question of trust.Considering the above mentioned ethical scenarios, certain values and normshave to be discussed. The technology has highly promising advantages and canbe a better value provided various ethical problems are answered.Safety: The chip implanted in the brain can create a reaction and may lead tohealth issues and also may malfunction to distort natural thought process.Security: due to the interfacing with the internet the chip opens up a high risk ofgetting hacked and reduces user privacy. Hence there should be proper firewallprotection.Engineering: The engineers and researchers should work on developing non-toxic materials with a high-quality standard in order to make it safe. Safe methodsto install the chip in the brain. Securing the chips from a security breach in orderto expand privacy features.Brain Chip Implants Philosophy of EthicsSociety: the society should work together and decide upon the odds to bridge theinequality created between people who have the technology and who don’t.Stakeholders and their interestGovernment: The technology develops the efficient communication methods andenhances human intelligence which promises high development of the researchbase and also enhancing the military coordination. However, the government willalso have measures to handle the inequality developed because of the change inhuman capabilities.Engineers: Engineers would be more focused on developing high-qualitymaterials that have zero side effects and researching on new functionality that canbe embedded into a chip. This also opens up a new gateway of knowledge andpossibility of new job opportunities.Manufacturer: Manufacturers play a crucial role in product safety, however; theprime concern of the manufacturer would be to increase the profit by executing alow budget production.Society: Society would be interested to enhance their capabilities provided thesafety of the product and installation process is taken care of and welldemonstrated.Possible Actions:Considering the turbulence caused by the introduction of such a technology,making the product commercial is still questionable. In such a scenario theproduct would find a non-conflicting application when used by a specific class ofpeople like military personnel and astronauts.Possible actions are:1. Commercialize the technology to make it available for all2. Restrict the availability of technology for specific purpose (preferably undergovernment)Ethical evaluation:Utilitarianism:A Utilitarian framework evaluates if the action is right or wrong by evaluatingthe happiness or pleasure against the unhappiness or pain. 3On commercializing the technology, it created it would create happiness amongpeople due to the enhancement it can produce to oneself. But the cost of theBrain Chip Implants Philosophy of Ethicstechnology would make it inaccessible for the majority of the population andwould create a distress among the people.On restricting the availability of the technology for a specific purpose it enhancesthe functionality among that specific group, moreover, the government wouldhave better control over the spreading out of such a technology.Common-sense:Making the technology available for a specific group will not have any distressamong common people compared to the inequality created when it iscommercialized.Social Contract Theory:Social contract theory also aims at taking a decision which can make everyone inthe society flourish. On introducing the technology that can create inequality willnot let the technology accessible to all and hence would not flourish the society.However, the supervised use of technology for certain purpose can be done understrict conditions and monitored applications, considering the welfare of thesociety.