The Common Examples Of Wireless Equipments Computer Science Essay

Chapter 1

Wireless communicating is used to reassign information between two or more points that have no physical connexion.

The distance between pass oning points can be short, such as a few metres for AC remote control, or even 1000000s of kilometres for deep infinite wireless communications. It encompasses assorted types of personal digital helpers ( PDAs ) , portable bipartisan wirelesss, cellular telephones and radio networking. Some other illustrations of radio engineering are cordless telephones, garage door openers, wireless computing machine mice, keyboards and headset, wireless receiving systems, satellite telecasting etc. Wireless operations allow services such as long scope communications. These types of communications are impossible or impractical to implement with the usage of wires.

We Will Write a Custom Essay about The Common Examples Of Wireless Equipments Computer Science Essay
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now


1 Common illustrations of wireless equipments include:

Telemetry and traffic control systems.Remote control devices utilizing infrared and supersonic moving ridges engineering.Modulated optical maser light systems used for point-to-point communications.SMR ( Specialized Mobile Radio ) and professional LMR ( Land Mobile Radio ) used by industrial, concern and public safety systems.Consumer two manner wireless including GMRS ( General Mobile Radio Service ) , FRS Family Radio Service, and Citizens Band ( “ CB ” ) radios etc.The Amateur Radio Service ( Ham wireless ) .Consumer & A ; professional Marine VHF wireless.Radio pilotage equipments that are used by aeronauts and air traffic control systems.

Cellular telephones and beepers.Connectivity for portable and nomadic applications.Global Positioning System ( GPS ) [ 1 ] that allows drivers of autos, captains of ships, and pilots of aircraft to determine their location anyplace on Earth.Cordless computing machine peripheral devices. For illustration the cordless mouse, keyboards and pressmans can be linked to a computing machine via radio utilizing engineering such as bluetooth.Limited-range devices such as cordless telephones.Satellite telecasting which broadcasts from orbiters in geostationary orbit.

Typical services use direct broadcast orbiter that is used to supply multiple telecasting channels to viewing audiences.

1.2 What are Ad hoc Networks?

The webs without any centralised or pre-established substructure are known as Ad hoc webs. Ad hoc webs are a aggregation of autonomous nomadic nodes [ 2 ] . Self-configuration and self- healing are the cardinal features of ad hoc webs.


2.1 Features of ad hoc webs

The features of these webs are as follows:They communicate via radio agencies.Nodes act both as hosts and routers.There is no centralised accountant and substructure.Network topology is dynamic and frequent routing updates occur.They are independent and no substructure is required.

Can be set up anyplace in short clip.More energy restraints.Security is limited.Self-configuring nodes besides serve as routers.Self-healing through re-configuration procedure.Scalable ( accommodates add-on of nodes ) .


1.2.3 Restrictions of Ad Hoc Networks:

Some restrictions of ad hoc webs are:Every node of the web must hold full public presentationSystem lading effects throughputReliability requires a sufficient denseness of nodes. Sparse webs can hold jobsLarge webs can hold latency.

1.3 What are MANETs?

A Mobile Ad hoc Network ( MANET ) is an independent aggregation of nomadic nodes that can pass on over comparatively bandwidth-constrained wireless links. Nodes in the web are Mobile and web topology may alter erratically over clip.

The web is decentralized. Nodes perform all web activities including detecting the topology. Messages bringing is besides executed by the nodes themselves.

This means that routing functionality is incorporated into nomadic nodes.

1.4 What are VANETs?

Vehicular ad hoc Network ( VANET ) is a type of ad hoc web in which traveling vehicles act as nodes of the web. Vehicles communicate wirelessly through multi-hop waies. Vehicles use intermediate vehicles as relays to transport informations to concluding finishs.

Higher node mobility, quickly altering web topology are the chief features of VANETs. This means that web topology is extremely dynamic [ 3 ] .Fig. 1.1 vehicle to vehicle communicating in VANETsMain aim of VANETs is safety and handling of exigency state of affairss. VANETs assist drivers to pass on among themselves to avoid any critical state of affairs e.g.

route side accidents, traffic jams and velocity control etc. In instance of an accident or sudden difficult breakage, a presentment is sent to the predating autos. Concerted driver aid system may be used for message extension. It exploits the exchange of detector informations or some position information among autos. The drivers therefore acquire information about obstructions and jeopardies.

Besides safety applications VANET besides provide comfort applications to the route users. For illustration, conditions information, nomadic e-commerce, Internet entree and other multimedia applications [ 4 ] . VANETs do non utilize any telecommunication substructure. However, substructure is used in intelligent transit systems ( ITS ) [ 5, 6 ] .VANET is a particular type of MANET where vehicles act as nodes.

Unlike MANET, vehicles move on predefined roads/paths. There are many challenges in VANET which need to be solved to supply dependable services.Reliable routing in VANET is one of the major issues. Vehicles have dynamic behaviour in VANETs and high velocity of vehicles make routing more ambitious. Routing in MANETs ( Mobile Ad hoc Networks ) is non every bit hard as in VANETs.

This is due to less mobility of nodes. Many routing protocols such as AODV [ 7 ] , DSR [ 8 ] have been developed for MANETs. These protocols fail to execute for VANETs due to high mobility of vehicles. Frequently altering web topology of VANETs hinders path finding every bit good as way care procedure.Scarcity of bandwidth in wireless communicating is another issue. Available bandwidth may be wasted by the unneeded rebroadcast of informations and control packages. Simple broadcasts use deluging where every node in the web forwards the package each clip it is received.

This creates broadcast redundancy. When nodes denseness in the web is high, more hits and contentions are triggered as a consequence of excess transmittal. Furthermore web bandwidth is besides wasted due to such excess transmittals. This is a broadcast storm job. In instance of VANETs, congestion ( e.g. congestion at junctions ) intensifies the job which may fall in the full web.

Ad hoc routing protocols like AODV [ 7 ] experience operating expense and devour a big part of bandwidth during path find, routing table updating and path mistake coverage stages. These protocols hence, can non be applied to VANETs.


1 Features of VANETs

VANETs have some unique features which make them different from MANET every bit good as challenging.


1 Highly dynamic topology

The topology of VANET alterations often because vehicles move at a high velocity. Frequent disconnected web

Highly dynamic topology consequences in frequent disjunction occur between two vehicles when they are interchanging information. In thin webs, disjunction occurs often.


3 Mobility mold

The mobility form of vehicles is dependent upon traffic environment, roads constructions, driver ‘s driving behaviour and the velocity of vehicles. Battery power

Vehicles have battery power that can be used for communicating and processing.


2 Applications of VANETs

Examples of some of the VANET ‘s applications are given below.Concerted aid: distribution of informations ( warning of accidents ) .Car-to-Mobile devices: applications used for communicating between the auto and nomadic devices ( e.g. nomadic phone, laptop etc ) .Car-to-Enterprise: communications between the auto and companies ( e.

g. gas Stationss, eating houses, parking countries etc ) which provide services on route.Car-to-infrastructure: Hot musca volitanss send information to autos giving route and traffic information and auto entree to Internet etc.Car-to-Car: exchange of information between auto users such as files, going, chat, games and amusement etc.


4.3 Classs of routing protocols in VANETs

Routing protocols in VANET can be categorized into following types [ 9 ] :Topology basedPosition basedGeo-cast basedBunch basedBroadcast-basedInfrastructure based


3.1 Topology based routing

These protocols use route find procedure and keep it in a tabular array. The transmitter so starts conveying informations. These protocols are farther divided into:ProactiveReactiveHybrid protocols.

Proactive protocols

These protocols are besides known as table driven routing protocols. These protocols sporadically exchange the cognition of topology among all the nodes of the web.

These protocols consume a batch of bandwidth for periodic updates of topology. Proactive protocols monitor peer connectivity sporadically to guarantee the handiness of any way amongst active nodes. Because these protocols sporadically update topology information, a batch of set breadth is consumed. This makes them unsuitable for VANETs.

Reactive protocols

“ On demand ” or reactive routing protocols were designed to get the better of the operating expense created by proactive routing protocols. These protocols maintain merely those paths that are presently active. Paths are discovered every bit good as maintained for merely those nodes that are presently being used to direct informations from beginning to the finish.

Route find in reactive routing is done by directing RREQ ( Route Request message ) from a beginning node when some informations is to be sent to a peculiar finish. After directing RREQ, beginning node delaies for the RREP ( Route Reply ) message. If it does non have any RREP within a given clip period, it is assumed that either path is non available or it is expired.

Reactive routing can either be beginning routing or hop-by-hop routing. In beginning routing, complete path information from beginning to finish is present in informations packages. When these informations packages are forwarded to other intermediate nodes in the web, each node uses route information nowadays in the information package. Here intermediate nodes do non necessitate to update all path information in order to direct packages to the finish.However, chief drawback of beginning routing is that it is non suited for big graduated table webs. Further, these protocols do non hold good public presentation in extremely dynamic environment such as VANETs.Hop-by-hop reactive routing works better than on demand beginning routing.

Here each information package contains following hop and finish references. Intermediate nodes from beginning to finish contain routing table information to direct informations package to a finish. This is more helpful for suiting sudden alterations in topology. When topology alterations nodes receives fresh routing table information and new paths are selected consequently. The selected paths will now be used to direct informations packages to finish.

The Hybrid protocols

The design purpose of intercrossed protocols was to cut down the control operating expense of proactive routing protocols and diminish initial path find hold in reactive routing protocols.


3.2 Position based protocols

These protocols make usage of geographic positioning information to choose the following hop.Global path or hop-by-hop path between beginning and finish are created and maintained.


3.3 Geo-cast based protocols

These protocols are used to direct messages to all vehicles present in a pre-defined geographical part. Cluster-based routing protocols

In these routing protocols, vehicles in vicinity of each other signifier a bunch.

Each bunch has one cluster-head. The cluster-head is responsible for intra every bit good as inter-cluster direction maps. Intra-cluster nodes can pass on each other via direct links. Inter-cluster communicating is performed utilizing cluster-heads. In cluster-based routing protocols, formation of bunchs and the choice of the cluster-head is a critical issue.


5 Broadcast based protocols

These protocols use simple broadcast medium to direct informations packages to finishs. Infrastructure based protocols

These protocols are substructure based and utilize some substructure for routing. This means that routing in these protocols is non done in strictly ad hoc manner.


5 Problem statement of the Thesis

Vehicular Ad hoc Networks ( VANETs ) are extremely dynamic webs because of high mobility of vehicles. Highly dynamic web topology of VANETs hinders path finding every bit good as way care procedure. High mobility of nodes consequences in more links breakages and degrades web public presentation in a proportionate manner. This means that the frequence of alteration in topology is excessively high to find a dependable way to the finish. This makes routing in VANETs a ambitious undertaking. This undertaking addresses the routing issue in VANETs and proposes place and mobility parameter-based ( PAMP ) VANET routing protocol.


6 Purposes and aims

Aim of this research work is to develop an efficient routing protocol for VANETs and measure its public presentation in footings of different public presentation prosodies.

1.7 Outline of the thesis

Chapter 2 discusses different VANET routing protocols. Here drawbacks of these protocols are besides identified.Chapter 3 gives the description of place and mobility parametric quantities based ( PAMP ) VANET routing protocol. This chapter describes how the proposed will better public presentation in footings of different public presentation prosodies.Chapter 4 is based upon simulation environment and public presentation analysis. It discusses simulation consequences in footings of different public presentation prosodies.

Chapter 5 gives the sum-up of the research work and describes hereafter work.

Chapter 2

Reappraisal of the Existing Routing Schemes in VANETs

2.1 Introduction

Routing of informations in VANETs is a ambitious undertaking due to extremely dynamic topology of the web. This causes routing complexness in these webs.

This Chapter gives a study of bing routing strategies in vehicular webs.

2.2 GSR ( Geographic Source Routing )

Initially, GSR [ 10 ] was developed to be used in MANET. Later on some betterments were made to utilize it in VANET scenario. It was modified by integrating avaricious forwarding of messages toward the finish in it.

GSR utilizes a recovery scheme if there are no nodes in the way of finish at any hop. This scheme is known as margin manner. This manner has two constituents. One is known as distributed polarisation algorithm.

This makes local transition of connectivity graph into two-dimensional graph by taking excess borders. Second constituent is known as online routing algorithm. This constituent operates on planing machine graphs.In VANETs perimeter manner of GSR is used. It starts directing the message to intercede neighbour instead than to farthest node. This method introduces long holds due to greater figure of hop counts. Rapid motion of vehicles introduces routing cringles which causes airing of messages to long way. It uses inactive street map and location information about each node.

It does non see vehicle denseness. So it is non an efficient method.


Long holds due to greater figure of hops.Attempts to set up end-to-end connexions which are hard at low traffic denseness. Further, end-to-end connexion strategy does n’t work in a extremely dynamic environment.

2.3 GPCR ( Greedy Perimeter Coordinator Routing )

Lochert et Al. designed GPCR [ 11 ] in an effort to cover with the challenges of metropolis scenarios. This protocol makes usage of a restricted greedy send oning process along a preselected way. When following hop is chosen, a coordinator ( the node on a junction ) is preferred to a non coordinator node.

The preferable coordinator may non the geographically closest node to the finish.


can non work without inactive street mapsEstablishes end-to-end connexions which are hard when traffic denseness is low.

2.4 A-STAR ( Anchor-based Street and Traffic Aware Routing )

This protocol was proposed by Seet et Al. The proposed A-STAR [ 12 ] was an effort to vouch end-to-end connexion in a vehicular web when traffic denseness is low.In A-STAR [ 12 ] , the figure of junctions to make the finish is computed. This protocol besides uses traffic information and street consciousness in way determination. It uses street consciousness to acquire the ground tackle information harmonizing to the street map.

This makes usage of dynamically and statically rated maps to happen the figure of junctions. In statistically rated maps, A-STAR utilizations agenda of coachs to guarantee high connectivity. For illustration, some streets are served by regular metropolis coachs and their connectivity can be high due to presence of coachs. In dynamically rated maps, the protocol collects the latest traffic information in order to happen the anchors/junctions to calculate the way. Some roads are wider than other and have more traffic. That is why connectivity is high on wider roads with high traffic ( more vehicles ) .

Using such type of traffic information, A-Star assigns the weight to the street. This is a dynamic procedure that helps this protocol to cipher ground tackles more accurately.


Establishes and uses routing waies. This attack for package forwarding can non work in a often altering web topology.

Further, the routing waies established are non optimum and consequence in hold of package transmittal.

2.5 MDDV ( Mobility-Centric Data Dissemination Algorithm for Vehicular Networks )

This protocol was proposed by Wu et Al. MDDV [ 13 ] attempts to accomplish dependable and efficient routing.

It combines timeserving forwarding, trajectory-based forwarding and geographical forwarding. This protocol takes into history the traffic denseness. It specifies a forwarding flight that extends from the beginning to the finish ( trajectory-based forwarding ) . A message will travel along this flight and will acquire geographically closer to the finish ( geographical forwarding ) .

The forwarding flight is selected based upon the geographical cognition and traffic denseness. In MDDV it is assumed that traffic denseness is inactive. Forwarding flight is used to send on the messages through intermediate nodes which are used to hive away and send on messages.


Main drawback of this attack is that it uses trajectory-based forwarding which fails when mobility of vehicles is really high.

2.6 VADD ( Vehicle-Assisted Data Delivery )

This protocol [ 14 ] was proposed by Zhao and Cao.The purpose of this protocol was to vouch an end-to-end connexion in a sparse web with low hold.

This protocol is based upon the thought of carry and forward by utilizing predicable mobility particular to sparse web. The protocol does non utilize any pre-defined way for routing. It chooses following hop based on the some pre-defined way precedence by choosing the closest one to finish. This protocol does non foretell the environment alteration in the hereafter.


Adequate clip required for connexion apparatus & A ; route constitution.Intermediate nodes can take to inconsistency in the path if they contain old entries.Because of periodic beaconing it consumes excess bandwidth.Fails to work at high mobility.

2.7 DGRP ( Directional Greedy Routing Protocol )

It ‘s a place based greedy routing protocol [ 15 ] . It uses the two forwarding schemes greedy and margin. It predicts the nodes places within the beacon interval whenever a information package needs to be forwarded. This anticipation is done utilizing old cognition about place, velocity, and way of gesture of node. If nexus between the forwarding node and its neighbour node is non stable, possibility of package loss is high in DGRP. Further the anticipation of place information is non ever dependable.


package bringing ratio is really lowbig hold at high traffic densenessutilizations to many hops to make the finish


8 Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing ( GPSR )

GPSR [ 16 ] is a routing protocol for nomadic radio webs. Many other routing algorithms before GPSR used graph-theoretic impressions of shortest waies and transitive reachability to happen paths. GPSR nevertheless exploits the correspondence between geographic place and connectivity in a radio web.

For this intent it uses places of nodes to do package forwarding determinations. It uses avaricious send oning to send on packages to nodes that are closer to the finish. In some parts of the web, a avaricious way may non be. In this instance, GPSR recovers by send oning in margin manner. In this manner a package traverses in turn two-dimensional sub-graph of the full wireless web connectivity graph until a node closer to the finish is reached. Here avaricious send oning sketchs.


It uses a longer way to the finish doing more transmittal hold. Further, it can work when web is heavy plenty and may neglect otherwise.

2.9 PDGR ( Predictive Directional Greedy Routing )

In PDGR [ 17 ] the leaden mark is calculated for current neighbours and possible hereafter neighbours. In PDGR, the leaden tonss for immediate nodes 2-hops off are besides calculated. Here following hop choice is made based upon the anticipation and it is non dependable in all state of affairss. It does non supply warrant that the bringing of package to the node nowadays in the border of the transmittal scope of node considered as following hop.

In high kineticss of vehicles, this has low package bringing ratio, high hold and an increased routing operating expense.


big hold when traffic denseness is high.low package bringing ratio and increased routing operating expense.

2.10 Potential Edge Node Based Greedy Routing Algorithm ( EBGR )

Potential Edge Node Based Greedy Routing Algorithm ( EBGR ) [ 18 ] is a uni-cast and place based greedy routing algorithm. It was designed for directing messages from a node to any other node in a vehicular ad hoc web ( VANET ) . The purpose of the EBGR algorithm is to optimise the package behaviour for VANETs with high mobility and present messages with high dependability.

The algorithm for EBGR has six basic functional units. ( 1 ) Neighbor Node Identification ( NNI ) , ( 2 ) Distance Calculation ( DC ) ( 3 ) Direction of Motion Identification ( DMI ) , ( 4 ) Thinking Link Stability ( RLS ) , ( 5 ) Potential mark computation ( PS ) and ( 6 ) Edge Node Selection ( ENS ) .The NNI is used for roll uping information of all neighbour nodes present within the transmittal scope of source/forwarder node at any clip. The DC is responsible for ciphering the intimacy of the following hop utilizing information from GPS system.

DMI is responsible to place the way of gesture of neighbour nodes which is traveling towards finish. The RLS is responsible for placing nexus stableness between the source/packet bearer node and its neighbour nodes. The PS is responsible to cipher possible mark and it besides identifies the neighbour node holding a higher potency for farther forwarding of a peculiar package to the finish. The ENS is responsible to choose an border node holding higher possible mark in different degrees of transmittal scope.


Its ENS unit tries to place border nodes that more likely to be out of a node ‘s scope. This strategy fails when there are vehicles traveling with variable velocities.

2.11 Fisheye province routing ( FSR )

In FSR [ 19 ] , a topology tabular array ( TT ) is used. This tabular array is maintained by a node based upon the latest information received from neighbours. Table information is sporadically exchanged with local neighbours.

In the instance of big webs size of message should be reduced. For this intent, FSR uses the different exchange period for different entries in routing tabular arraies. The job with the FSR routing is that size of routing table additions with the addition in web size. With the addition in mobility, path to remote finish besides become less accurate.


Size of routing table additions with the addition in web sizeWith the addition in mobility, path to remote finish besides become less accurate.

It has really hapless public presentation in big ad hoc webs.Less or no cognition about distant nodes.With the addition in web, the treating operating expense of routing tabular array besides increases.Information for path constitution is non sufficient.

2.12 Temporally Ordered Routing Algorithm ( TORA )

In TORA [ 20 ] , routing is based on directed acyclic graphs. These graphs direct the flow of packages and guarantee its reachability to all nodes. A node constructs the directed graph by airing query packages.

On having a question package, node holding a downward nexus to finish broadcasts a answer package. Otherwise package is merely dropped. TORA has the advantage that it gives a path to all the nodes in the web. The job for TORA is that care of all these paths is really hard in VANETs.


Care of all paths is really hard in VANETs.It is non scalable.


13 Greedy Traffic Aware Routing protocol ( GyTAR )

Greedy Traffic Aware Routing protocol [ 21 ] has given a new construct of intersection-based routing protocol. The chief intent of this protocol was to cut down the control message overhead & A ; end-to-end hold with low package loss.


This depends upon roadside units which have their ain drawbacks.

2.14 CAR ( Connectivity-Aware Routing )

For metropolis and main road environment Connectivity-Aware Routing ( CAR ) [ 22 ] has been designed. It is based on AODV for way find but uses Preferred Group Broadcasting ( PGB ) for information airing manner.


Path find procedure used by AODV can non be used in VANETs.

Unnecessary nodes can be selected as ground tackle nodes.Path find procedure does non work in a quickly altering web topology.

2.15 Street Topology Based Routing ( STBR )

The proposed protocol Street Topology-Based Routing ( STBR ) [ 23 ] is based upon the undermentioned thought. Clarify a given street map as a planar graph which has three valid provinces ( 1 ) maestro ( 2 ) slave ( 3 ) forwarder for a node. In this protocol, one node is selected as a maestro on a junction and other nodes act as slaves. The intermediate nodes between junctions serve as forwarders.


In STBR complexness additions due to some particular instances. For illustration, reassigning the neighbour tabular array to new maestro when old maestro leaves the junction.

2.16 Greedy Routing with Abstract Neighbor Table ( GRANT )

GRANT [ 24 ] applies an drawn-out greedy routing algorithm construct. Abstract Neighbor Table of GRANT performs division of the plane into countries and includes merely one representative neighbour per country.


Performance rating of GRANT has been done on inactive hints but VANET has a high mobility features.There is operating expense of beacons. Further the inaccuracy in package bringing has non been measured.


17 Direction-based AODV routing protocol ( DAODV )

Working of this protocol [ 25 ] is as follows.1- Discovers waies to the finish utilizing path petition message ( RREQ ) . Sender multi-casts RREQ to the nodes selected based upon their place and way.2-Uses routing tabular arraies for packages send oning.4- Performs path care.

5- Routing tabular arraies are often updated due to alter in web topology.The attack used in DAODV is similar to that used in AODV. The lone difference between this strategy and AODV is that DAODV uses place and way during path find procedure.

Like AODV, Route find procedure of DAODV uses RREQ ( route petition ) message.When a beginning node wants to pass on finish node, DAODV multi-casts RREQ message to selected neighbour nodes. This choice is made upon their place and way. Neighbors having the petition ( RREQ ) frontward RREQ further and so on. The beginning acquires route answer ( RREP ) message when path is successfully discovered.Packages are forwarded to the finish utilizing routing tabular arraies. When routing mistake occurs during package forwarding, path mistake message ( RERR ) is sent back to the transmitter. The transmitter so initiates route find procedure once more.

Drawbacks1- It uses path find procedure as used in AODV routing protocol.2 – Like AODV, it uses routing tabular arraies which fail to update a high frequence of nexus breakages.3- Parameters used for following hop choice are non sufficient to choose best following hops.4- It fails to work when mobility of nodes is high. At high mobility, frequence of alteration in topology is excessively high to find a dependable way to the finish.


18 Cluster Based Location Routing ( CBLR )

CBRL [ 26 ] is a reactive and bunch based routing protocol. During bunch formation every node broadcasts a hello message and so delaies for a predefined clip. When the node receives a answer from a bunch heading before the timer expires, it becomes a cluster member.

It becomes a bunch heading, otherwise.Each bunch heading maintains a tabular array which contains the references and geographic locations of bunch members and gateways nodes. It besides maintains a Cluster Neighbor Table to hive away the information about the adjacent bunchs.

When a beginning wants to direct informations package to a finish, it foremost checks whether the finish is in same bunch. If finish is in same bunch, the beginning sends the package to the neighbour closest to the finish. Otherwise, informations package is stored in the buffer of beginning which starts a timer and broadcasts Location Request ( LREQ ) packages. In order to minimise figure of transmittals, merely gateways and cluster-heads can retransmit the LREQ package.After having a petition, each cluster-head cheques whether the finish is member of its ain bunch or non. If finish is a cluster member, so bunch heading sends a Location Reply ( LREP ) package to the transmitter based upon the information nowadays in LREQ package and bunch neighbour tabular array.Otherwise it retransmits LREP to adjacent cluster-headers. CBLR is more suited for webs holding high mobility because the location of the beginning and finish is updated every clip before informations transmittal starts.


Use implosion therapy. This consequences in wastage of bandwidth.Cluster-head may be a individual point of failure.


19 Robust Vehicular Routing ( ROVER )

ROVER [ 27 ] is a geographical multicast protocol where control packages are broadcasted and the informations packages are uni-casted in the web. The intent of this protocol is to direct messages to all other vehicles within a specified Zone of Relevance ( ZOR ) . Zone of Relevance is defined as a rectangular country specified by its corner co-ordinates. A message is defined by the [ A, M, Z ] three which indicates the specified application, message and individuality of a zone severally. When a vehicle receives a message, it will accept message if it is within the ZOR.

Robust Vehicular Routing protocol besides defines a Zone of Forwarding ( ZOF ) . This zone includes the beginning and the ZOR. All nodes in ZOF are used in the routing procedure. The protocol uses a reactive path find procedure within a ZOR. This creates batch of excess messages in the web which leads to wastage of bandwidth, congestion and high hold in informations transportation. To get the better of this issue, two Zone Dissemination Protocol for VANETs was proposed.

This protocol uses hop-count in package. The counter is decremented when the package is forwarded. When the hop-count counter reaches to zero, the package is discarded. This may do the nodes near to the transmitter frontward same package multiple times. This job is avoided by presenting sequence figure for every package to happen whether a package has been already received or non.


Use deluging which consequences in wastage of bandwidth.Zone of Relevance ( ZOR ) and Zone of Forwarding ( ZOF ) change really shortly when vehicles are traveling at high velocity. This requires new specifications of these zones. Re-specification of these zones at a high frequence may be debatable.There are many other protocols proposed for VANETs.

But all of them have one or more lacks. For illustration the proposed protocols in [ 28, 29, 30 ] are based on inactive map of metropoliss and their map is restricted by cognition of route topology. These protocols have hapless public presentation in footings of one or more public presentation prosodies besides.

2.20 Drumhead

VANETs have a extremely dynamic web topology.

This makes routing a disputing undertaking in VANETs. Due to routing complexness in VANETS, none of the proposed protocol can be considered as ideal one. Every protocol has one or more drawbacks associated with it.

Chapter 4

Simulation Environment & A ; Performance Analysis

4.1 What is a simulation?

Simulation is an of import research patterning tool used in scientific discipline, technology and other applications for different intents.

Computer assisted simulations are used to pattern conjectural and real-life objects or activities on a computing machine. This helps to analyze system maps. Different variables can be used to depict the behaviour of the system. Computer simulations assist in mold and analysis of many natural systems.

Its application countries include natural philosophies, chemical science, biological science and human-involved systems. Other applications are in the technology such as mechanical technology, structural technology and computing machine technology. Application of simulation engineering in networking country such as web traffic simulation nevertheless, is really of import.

Network simulations may be concerned with the public presentation or cogency of a distributed protocol or algorithm. Furthermore, web engineerings are developing really fast. Therefore, web simulations require unfastened platforms which should be scalable adequate to include different faculties and bundles in the simulations of an full web. Internet is besides structured with a uniformed web stack ( TCP/IP ) that all the different beds engineerings can be implemented otherwise but with an interface linking it with their neighbored beds. Thus the web simulation tools should be able to integrate this characteristic and let new bundles to be included and run without harming bing constituents.

In this manner there would be no or small negative impact of some bundles on the other bundles.Network simulators are used in different countries such as academic research workers, industrial developers to plan, imitate, verify, and analyze consequences. They are used to analyze the consequence of the different parametric quantities on the protocols being evaluated. By and large a web simulator comprises of a broad scope of networking engineerings and protocols.

This helps the users to construct complex webs from constructing blocks like bunchs of nodes and links. User can emulate different web topologies utilizing assorted types of nodes such as end-hosts, hubs, routers, optical link-layer devices.

4.2 Two types of web simulators:

Commercial: OPNET, QualNetOpen beginning: NS2, NS3, OMNeT++ , SSFNet, J-Sim4.2.1 Network Simulator ( NS2 )NS2 [ 31 ] is one of the popular unfastened beginning web simulators.

The original NS is a distinct event simulator used for networking research. NS2 is the 2nd version of NS ( Network Simulator ) . The first version of NS was developed in 1989. Current NS undertaking is supported through DARPA. Second version NS2 is widely used in research and it possess a batch of bundles contributed by different non-benefit groups. Main characteristics

NS2 [ 31 ] is an object-oriented, distinct event driven web simulator originally developed at University of California-Berkely.

It uses C++ and OTcl ( Tcl book linguistic communication with Object-oriented extensions developed at MIT ) . The usage of these two linguistic communications has its ain ground. The major ground is the internal features of these two linguistic communications. C++ is good to implement a design but it is non suited to be ocular and diagrammatically shown. It is hard to modify and assembly different constituents. Furthermore, for efficiency ground, NS2 uses separate control way executions from the informations way execution. The objects for event scheduler and the basic web constituent in the informations way are written and compiled utilizing C++ to cut down package and event processing clip.

OTcl has many characteristics that C++ lacks. So the combination of these two linguistic communications is used for effectivity. C++ implements the elaborate protocol and OTcl helps the users to command the simulation scenario and agenda the events. A simplified user ‘s position of NS2 is shown in figure 4.

1. The OTcl book initiates the event scheduler, sets up the topology, and instructs traffic beginning when to get down and halt sending packages through event scheduler. The scenarios can be changed easy by programming in the OTcl book.

When a user wants to do a new web object, he can compose a new object or piece a new object from the bing library, and plumb the informations way through the object. This characteristic makes NS2 really powerful.OTCL bookOTCL:object-orientedtranslatorNS2 libraries:1 Event scheduler2 Network constituent3 Plumbing facultySimulationconsequencesAnalysisNAMenergizerFigure: 4.1 User ‘s View o degree Fahrenheit NS2 [ 31 ]NS2 is the event scheduler. In NS2, the events schedulers are used to maintain path of simulation clip and let go of the events in the event-queue by raising appropriate web constituents. All the web constituents use this scheduler by publishing an event for the package and waiting for the event to be released before farther action on the package takes topographic point.

Traffic hintfileNS2Analysis plans( scipt.Awk etc. )ASCII fileTCL bookc++otclconsequencesPlotingplanNAM hintgraphsNamEnergizerFigure: 4.2 Working of NS2 [ 31 ]

4.3 Traffic Simulators

A big figure of traffic simulators are available. Name callings of some of them are:Open beginning: SUMO [ 40 ] , VanetMobisim [ 32 ]Commercial: CORSIM [ 41 ] , PARAMICS [ 42 ]Traffic simulator used in this research work is VanetMobisim [ 32 ] .


3.1 VanetMobisim

VanetMobiSim [ 32 ] is a freely available generator of realistic vehicular motion hints for networks simulators. It is one of the vehicular mobility simulators to the full validated and freely available to the vehicular webs research community.VanetMobiSim is an extension to CanuMobiSim [ 36 ] which is a generic mobility simulator. CanuMobiSim [ 36 ] is a platform and simulator-independent package. It has been coded in SUN Java [ 37 ] and produces mobility hints for a figure of web simulators such as ns-2 [ 31 ] , GloMoSim [ 38 ] , and QualNet [ 39 ] .

It can besides incorporate user-defined or Geographic Data File ( GDF ) map [ 43 ] topologies. It contains a figure of mobility theoretical accounts and besides provides easy extensile mobility architecture. CanuMobiSim [ 36 ] nevertheless, suffers from a limited degree of item. This makes it unsuitable for patterning of vehicular gesture.VanetMobiSim extends the vehicular mobility support of CanuMobiSim to a higher grade of pragmatism. VanetMobiSim inherits all the characteristics of CanuMobiSim but besides contains the new characteristics. These new characteristic include Integration of TIGER maps [ 41 ] and Voronoi topologies, a complete route topology word picture, intersection mold, catching capablenesss, traffic light direction, the IDM-IM, the IDM-LC, and the MOBIL mobility theoretical accounts.Like CanuMobiSim, VanetMobiSim is a modular distinct event simulator.

It is based on SUN Java. The package architecture of VanetMobiSim is structured around two extension objects ( 1 ) the Universe ( 2 ) the Node. The Universe is used for inactive objects patterning, while the Node theoretical accounts movable objects. Each characteristic nowadays in VanetMobiSim is implemented as a faculty and is loaded at start-up from an.xml scenario file. Modular construction of VanetMobisim makes it easy to add new characteristics.

Vanet scenario definition( vanetmobisim ).xml filevanetmobisim trafficgeneratorTraffic.txtfileNS2 simulatorCBR beginning file.

trhint fileTcl fileFig. 4.3 User position of VanetMobisim and NS2 Macro-mobility Features

Macro-mobility consists of the undermentioned characteristics:Road topology, the route construction ( unidirectional or bidirectional, single- or multi-lane ) , the presence of traffic marks ( halt marks, traffic visible radiations, etc. ) and the route features ( velocity bounds, vehicle categories limitations ) .

The construct of macro-mobility besides includes the effects of the presence of points of involvements. These points influence motion forms of vehicles. VanetMobiSim defines the route topology in the undermentioned ways:TIGER map: the route topology is extracted from a map of the TIGER database [ 38 ] .

Clustered Voronoi graph: route topology is created indiscriminately by making a Voronoi tessellation on a set of non-uniformly distributed points. This creates configurable random graphs.The construct of vehicular macro-mobility is non limited to gesture restraints but it besides includes all facets related to the route construction word picture. VanetMobiSim besides contains:aˆ? Physical separation of opposite traffic flows on roads.aˆ? Roads with multiple lanes in both waies.aˆ? Speed restraints imposed at each route section.aˆ? Traffic marks at each route intersection. Micro-mobility Features

Micro-mobility includes the facets related to an single auto ‘s velocity and acceleration mold.VanetMobiSim adds two microscopic mobility theoretical accounts to include the direction at intersections regulated by traffic marks and roads with multiple lanes. Two original microscopic mobility theoretical accounts present in VanetMobisim are:

Intelligent Driver Model with Intersection Management ( IDM- IM ) :

This theoretical account adds intersection managing capablenesss to the behaviour of vehicles. IDM-IM theoretical accounts two different intersection scenarios: a intersection regulated by stop marks and a route junction ruled by traffic visible radiations.

Intelligent driver theoretical account with lane alteration ( IDM-LC ) :

This theoretical account extends IDM-IM theoretical account where vehicles can alter lane and can catch each other.

4.3.2 Mobility Model classs

There are a figure of mobility theoretical account classs present in VanetMobisim. Names of some of these are given below.

Random theoretical account

This class includes the undermentioned theoretical accounts-Random Waypoint Model-Random Direction-Random Walk

Manhattan Models

This class includes the undermentioned theoretical accounts-Freeway-Manhattan

Temporal dependant theoretical accounts

Models in this class are:-Gauss-Markov-Probabilistic Random Walk-Exponential correlated theoretical account

Group theoretical accounts

This class includes the undermentioned theoretical accounts:-Reference Point Group Model-Pursue theoretical account-String theoretical account-Row theoretical account

Graph theoretical accounts

– User graph theoretical account-random graph theoretical account

4.4 Simulation scenarios description

Graph theoretical account ( user graph theoretical account ) of VanetMobisim has been used to make route topology. The route created is multi-lane route. The route was populated with changing figure of autos. Vehicles can travel on different lanes with different velocities. Vehicles can catch each other. This emulates a main road scenario. Number of nodes pass oning each other is 75 % of entire figure of nodes in a simulation scenario. Staying 25 % are merely functioning as intermediate nodes. Simulation parametric quantities used are given in the tabular array 4.1.

Simulation parametric quantities

Simulation clip150 secArea1500*1500 M2Number of autos20,40,60,80,100Speed of autos50-95 km/hrPropagation theoretical accountTwo beam landMAC protocol802.11-bTransmission scope200 mCBR rate5 packet/secRadio frequence2.4 Ghz.UDP package size1400 bytesTable 4.1 Simulation parametric quantities

4.5 Performance prosodies

Different public presentation prosodies are used to look into the public presentation of routing protocols. Packet bringing ratio, mean end-to-end hold, packets bead ratio per centum and Jain ‘s fairness index [ 42 ] are selected prosodies to look into the public presentation of PAMP and compare it with the bing DAODV [ 25 ] routing protocol. The selected prosodies for protocols rating are defined as follows:Package bringing ratio per centum ( PDR % ) = ( Packets Received / Packets Sent ) 100Average end-to-end hold = norm of the times taken for all package to be transmittedacross a web from a beginning to its finish.Packages drop ratio per centum = ( packages dropped / packages sent ) 100Number of hits = figure of hits occurred during channel entree contentions.Fairness: equity of a protocol is its ability to apportion the channel bandwidth every bit.Jain ‘s fairness index [ 42 ] is defined as follows.( 4.1 )Where fraction of packages sent by transmitter I to the finishs.= square of fraction of packages received at all finishs during simulation clipN= figure of transmitters postulating for directing informations to finishs.Figure: 4.4 package bringing ratio per centum of PAMP and DAODV

4.5.1 Packet bringing ratio ( PDR per centum )

Figure 4.4 shows public presentation of PAMP and DAODV in footings of PDR per centum. PAMP starts with a higher PDR value. It outperform DAODV about through out the simulation clip. Initially, PDR per centum is low for both protocols. This is because the web has a low vehicular denseness. PDR increases with the addition in figure of nodes but so decreases dramatically.Better PDR value of PAMP is due to two chief features of this protocol.First, it uses individual hop attack to send on the packages. Here routing tabular arraies are non used for routing the packages. In the instance of DAODV, routing tabular arraies are used and maintained. Highly dynamic web topology of VANETs hinders path finding every bit good as way care procedure. High mobility of nodes consequences in more links breakages and degrades web public presentation in a proportionate manner. This means that the frequence of alteration in topology is excessively high to find a dependable way to the finish. Routing tabular arraies may neglect to update because of high frequence of links breakages. High mobility causes routing mistakes to happen once more and once more. Hence, the packages are dropped and PDR is decreased.Second, PAMP uses “ comparative velocity ” as an extra parametric quantity during the procedure of following hop choice. Relative velocity is the velocity of following node with regard to its transmitter. Here the following hop is selected with a possible lower comparative velocity value of a node. This addition the dependability and lastingness of nexus between sender/forwarder and the following hop.On the other manus, link dependability will be decreased when no comparative velocity is considered or a following hop with larger value of comparative velocity is selected. Particularly, when the node is at the border of transmitter ‘s transmittal scope, it can non be regarded as suited following hop without sing its comparative velocity. High mobility may do following hop to be out of transmitter ‘s scope merely after the package has been transmitted. As a consequence of this, following hop would neglect to have the package ensuing in a package bead.Package bringing ratio beads dramatically when figure of nodes is increased to 100. This sort of bead has been observed in the instance of both protocols. Packet bead may happen at web bed every bit good as MAC bed. When a package reaches the web bed, the routing protocol forwards it to following hop if possible. The package is otherwise, buffered for some clip. When a big figure of nodes are directing the packages, packages may be dropped because the undermentioned state of affairss may originate.1- The buffer is full and no more packages can be buffered.2- The clip that the package has been buffered for, exceeds the bound.Packet loss besides occurs at the MAC bed. When CSMA/CA is used as average entree mechanism, packages may be dropped due to the undermentioned grounds:When a big figure of nodes are postulating for medium entree, the radio channel gets so busy that the figure of back offs exceed the bound. This may do the freshly arrived packages to drop and diminish PDR.Figure 4.5 End-to-end hold of PAMP and DAODV

4.5.2 End-to-end hold

Figure 4.5 shows public presentation of PAMP and DAODV in footings of mean end-to-end hold. PAMP starts with a lower value of end-to- terminal hold. It outperform DAODV about through out the simulation clip. End-to-end hold tends to increase with the addition in figure of nodes.End-to-End holds incurred can be attributed to the following chief beginnings:1. Multi-hop nature of web: a message needs to track several hops to make its finish. The message incurs channel entree hold, processing, collection holds and line uping hold at each hop. So, the hold incurred by a message increases as the figure of hops to the finish additions.2. Channel entree hold: Contention based nature of radio channel forces the nodes to postulate for channel entree. Channel entree holds are normally maps of the figure of nodes and burden on each node in the web. It is besides a map of the transmittal power.3. Collection at intermediate nodes: Nodes aggregate information before conveying the information to the following hop.PAMP implements individual hop attack and has a lower collection clip and impart entree hold. DAODV [ 25 ] utilizations routing tabular arraies for send oning packages. It takes important sum of clip to update and keep routing tabular arraies and utilize them for package forwarding. When routing mistakes occur, routing tabular arraies need to be updated. This occurs often because the frequence of links breakages is really high. That is why, value of End-to-End hold in DAODV is larger than that of PAMP.Figure 4.6 Packet bead ratio per centum of PAMP and DAODV

4.5.3 Packets bead ratio per centum

Fig. 4.6 shows public presentation of PAMP and DAODV in footings of packages drop ratio per centum. Initially, package bead ratio for the both protocols is high because web is less populated. Packet bead ratio decreases with the addition in figure of nodes but so increases once more.In AODV, routing tabular arraies are used and maintained. Routing tabular arraies fail to update because of frequent disjunction of links. This causes the routing mistakes to happen often. Packages are dropped due to frequent happening of routing mistakes.Packages are besides dropped if following hop choice standards is non suited. When following hop is selected without sing its comparative velocity with regard to sender, lastingness of nexus between transmitter and following hop will be decreased and following hop may be out of transmitter ‘s scope before it receives a familial package.Graph shows that package bead ratio additions when figure of nodes addition to 100. When figure of transmittals addition, package may be dropped due to buffering size and clip limitations.Figure 4.7 Number of hits for PAMP and DAODV

4.5.4 Number of hits

Figure 4.7 shows public presentation of PAMP and DAODV in footings of figure of hits. Both of the protocols show about equal public presentation at low contention. PAMP outperforms DAODV at higher contention.Low public presentation of DAODV at a high value of figure of nodes can be explained as follows. In DAODV, an effort is made to detect more than one waies to the finish so that upon failure of one way, other may be used. Hence, the transmitter multi-casts RREQ message to a big figure of selected nodes. Every node having the RREQ, multi-casts in the similar manner. Here contention additions because a big figure of nodes want to convey at the same time ensuing in a big figure of hits. This is non the instance in PAMP where single-hop based attack for package forwarding is used.Figure 4.8 Jain ‘s fairness index of PAMP and DAODV

4.5.5 Jain ‘s equity index

Figure 4.8 shows the behaviour of both protocols in footings of Jain ‘s fairness index. Graph shows that value of fairness index decreases with the addition in figure of nodes. This means that equity of protocol lessenings with the addition in contention. This is due to the drawback of 802.11 sing it channel entree mechanism.DAODV has less fairness value as shown in figure 4.8. In DAODV, sender multi-casts RREQ message to a big figure of selected nodes. Every node having the RREQ, multi-casts in the similar manner. Here contention additions because a big figure of nodes want to convey at the same time. PAMP, on the other manus uses single-hop based attack for package forwarding. This decreases the contention degree in PAMP. Hence, PAMP outperforms DAODV in footings of equity index besides.

4.6 Drumhead

PAMP is a VANET routing protocol that uses individual hop attack for package forwarding. Here following hop is selected based upon its comparative speed with regard to sender and its place. Neither route find stage nor routing tabular arraies are used. On the other manus, DAODV uses RREQ messages to detect the path to finish. Here routing tabular arraies are used to hive away routing information. These operating expenses degrade the public presentation of DAODV in term of different public presentation prosodies.