The Effects of Depression and Happiness
The human life is a combination of moments of happiness and emotional distress. Each of these life conditions are marked with similarities and difference both in cause and effects to an individual. They are no doubt a major determinant to the quality of life an individual leads within the society. For example, depression is found to negate an individual’s attitude towards life and other members of the community while happiness strengthen appreciation and commitment of on people in creating and maintaining strong relationships with others. The feelings of depression and happiness among individuals are mainly attributed to external factors.
At the workplace for example, working conditions is a crucial consideration in determining whether employees are happy or depressed. On the other hand, both depression and happiness in daily life is dependent of the person’s ability to achieve their day-to-day objectives as well as meeting the expectations of the community (Rossi, 2003). This essay compares and contrasts the depression and happiness, their causes and effects on people. Of interest, the author will identify and discuss the similarities and difference of the effects of depression and happiness both at work and in daily life.
There are numerous reasons why people experience depression and happiness in life. Such are encompassed both in external and internal factor that influence the psychological perception and behavior. According to available psychological evidence, different people are marked with differences in their worldview as well as their level to tolerate emotional impacts in life. Indeed, this is the reason why same victims of stressful situations might not exhibit the same levels of depression (Cseh, 2008). This has the implication that depression and happiness are feelings that are driven by the mental perception of occurrences in the real world.
On the other hand, depression and happiness is greatly influenced by the underlying external factors, which determine the sustainable realization of social and economic objectives by an individual (Hammen, & Gotlib, 2009). It is no doubt that the influence we have on members of then society is instrumental to the interpersonal relationship that we have with them. Living with principles of societal expectation remains one of the most crucial considerations in formulating, implementing, and achieving personal objectives in the society.
In line with this, failure by members of the society to appreciate the efforts of an individual serves the purpose of promoting psychologically negative perception in the individual. It is to be noted that depression and happiness have numerous similarities and differences both at the workplace and in influencing the day-to-day life of the victim. Whether at the workplace or not, depression find the importance of begin an emotional phenomenon affecting the interaction, behavior, and perception of an individual to others thus, both depression and happiness enjoy the provisions of being emotional phenomena (Hammen, & Gotlib, 2009).
Both depression and happiness have numerous implications on personal and organizational survival in the community. On the side of the organization, these two human feelings have been found to play an instrumental role in determining the attitude and commitment of employees to the mission and objectives of an organization (L0pez, & Snyder, 2009). According to the principles of optimized productivity in an organization, employee management and engagement must be appreciated by all human resource managers in an organization. This is because it promotes the social life of the employees, a major factor in determining depression and happiness at the workforce.
Just to be appreciated is the fact that engagement and retention as a function of human resource management in an organization should entail the understanding and appreciation of the social and economic issues that influence the performance of an employee. By either definition, both depression and happiness are quite different emotional and psychological phenomena in an individual. This is due to the fact that as depression compromises the perception an individual in the society, happiness serves to promote relational aspects a person to others (Lopez, & Snyder, 2009).
Based on the above reasoning, depression is a real source of contradictive performance and/or effective realization of the policies of teamwork in an organization. It is commonly asserted that man is not an island. This has the implication that individuals are dependant on each other for the sustainable realization of their objectives. At the organization level, different functions of an organization dictate for different professional contribution. On the other hand, such functions should be well coordinated for ensuring the sustainable realization of the mission of the organization as a whole.
In addition, cooperation between employees depends on the personal feelings and attitude towards other members in the workforce. True to the letter, the success of teamwork in an organization is no doubt the ultimate the result of the level of interpersonal relations enjoyed by its members. As an example, a happy individual will serve to positively influence the actions of the group towards the realization of common good benefits not only to the organization but also to the team members (Hammen, & Gotlib, 2009). On the contrary, available information indicates that depression influences the development of anti-social and negated perception of values and norms in an individual.
Victims of depression find less appreciation to the need for engaging other members in the organization. This is mainly prompted by the fact that with a negated worldview, such individuals tent to assume a defiant attitude towards the laws and policies of an organization (Cseh, 2008). It is worthy noting that performance of a workforce is the ultimate measure of an organist ion’s possibility of long-term competitive advantage in the marketplace. On the other hand, commitment and performance of employees is highly dependant on the attitude of the individual towards organizational policies and other employees, an element that is determined by either depression or happiness in the employee.
Moreover, as a human resource management function personal behavior is instrumental in dictating the possibility of career development and employee retention in an organization. This means that happiness and depression play a big role in determining whether or not an employee sustains his or her job position. On the other hand, considerations of depression and happiness remain an influential question in determining the sustainable engagement of individuals in their personal life (Rossi, 2003). According to available psychological evidence, depression does not only promote antisocial character in an individual but also serves to prompt unethical behavior and attitude in the victim.
Indeed, depression is the reason behind the numerous incidences of suicide witnessed in the society as victims of such psychological problem find less hope and purpose in life (Cseh, 2008). In addition, mental or emotional distress has been blamed for promoting unethical behavior among members of the community. Depression serves to engage an individual in a life devaluing perception. This has the ultimate implication of compromising the victim’s attitude towards future existence in the society. This leads to lack of failure in the individual to appreciate and uphold societal norms and practices such as socialization with others, a factor which is constantly criticized for contributing to suicidal attitude among members of the community.
Another effect of both depression and happiness in the daily life of a person is that they determine the economic and social success of the individual (Easterlin, 2004). In the modern capitalistic society, economic independence dictates the possible achievement of sustainable survival of an individual. On the other hand, the search for economic survival is increasingly based on the networking ability of the individual, an element that calls for promoting social living with other members in the community. On this note, since happiness improves personal appreciation to others, it no doubt serves to promote the interpersonal relationship and thus personal life (Easterlin, 2003). Such are nevertheless negated by depression which as it promotes hatred and anti-social attitude in a person.
In conclusion, it is evidently clear that depression and happiness are quite similar in terms of their nature and effects in life. This is because they are both attributed to emotional status in an individual. However, these two human feeling differ in the impact they bring to the life of an individual. Depression is the ultimate cause of anti-social behavior in the society. It serves the purpose of inhibiting the sustainable success of teamwork in an organization. On the contrary, happiness promotes interpersonal relations as well as enhancing health status among individuals (Easterlin, 2003). This has the implication that happiness serves to improve the social life and economic productivity of an individual. Therefore, members of the community should seek to create the necessary conditions for promoting happiness among its members if sustainable social and economic development is to be realized in the community.
Cseh, A. (2008). The Effects of Depressive Symptoms on Earnings. Southern Economic Journal, 75, 12-21.
Easterlin, R. (2003). Explaining Happiness. Retrieved August 27, 2010, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC196947/
Easterlin, R. (2004). The Economics of Happiness. Daedalus, 133, 21-32.
Hammen, C., & Gotlib, L. (2009). Handbook of Depression. New York: Guilford Press.
Lopez, S., & Snyder, C. (2009). Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rossi, J. (2003). The Art of Happiness at Work. Retrieved August 27, 2010, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0MNT/is_10_57/ai_108787973/