The Future For Sustainable Housing Construction Essay

As we move into a new decennary, the market for off-site industry ( OSM ) is spread outing quickly in order to run into the ever-growing demand for lodging in the UK and has initiated a alteration in to a more holistic attack to the whole edifice procedure ( ModuleCo 2010 ) .

There are assorted definitions used to find what OSM really is and its procedures but it is widely accepted that its merely a term used to “ depict any building procedure that is carried out off from a edifice site, such as in a mill or in a specially created impermanent production installation near to the building site ” ( Riley, M. & A ; Cotgrave, A. 2008 ) .

OSM is n’t needfully a new construct in the building industry and has been used for many old ages as a agency of supplying sustainable lodging that is realistically corruptible to a diverse terminal market ( Kelly, R. 1998 ) .

Even back in the early 1900 ‘s, the construct of OSM was being pushed for by certain constructionists as an option to the dearly-won traditional edifice methods possessed during these times. The celebrated German designer Walter Gropius ( 1924 ) stated that “ aˆ¦the existent solution is that houses should non be built at the site, but in specialized mills ” ( Sullivan, B.S. 1981 ) . As can be imagined, ‘sustainability ‘ was an unheard and unknown of entity back so.

After World War II, OSM was used to replace the many places that had been bombed. The UK authorities implemented system constructing re-using inexpensive war stuffs such as aluminum to construct the lodging as a quick and easy erected remedial solution ( Womack, J.P. et al 1990 ) . These houses subsequently became known as ‘flatpack ‘ lodging ( WW2 Talk 2010 ) .

However, despite the benefits to the public brought by these houses, there was still a stigma environing their business. This is still made evident presents with a bulk of pre and post-war lodging nicknamed ‘tin-houses ‘ or ‘tin-towns ‘ ( Ireland, B. & A ; Turnball, D. 2006 ) . Although their expected design life was merely 10 old ages ( Gibb, A.G.F.1999 ) , many still stand today in metropoliss such as Birmingham and London.

Figure 1 ( below-left on following page ) , shows a image of the ‘pre-fab ‘ Catford estate, South-east London during the 1960 ‘s ; long after it was expected to last ( WW2 Talk 2010 ) .

Figure 1 Beginning: Bell, R. ( 2010 )

Figure 2 ( below ) , shows how the Catford estate looks today. Its sempiternity has led to the estate to go heritage listed ( WW2 Talk 2010 ) ; a somewhat jubilation of the exceeding architecture or historic involvement that this set of houses brings to the country ( English-heritage 2010 ) .

Figure 2 Beginning: Bell, R. ( 2010 )

Since the birth of sustainable development ( UN 1992 ) , the on-going argument as to whether it forms an of import portion of the sustainable building docket has continued till nowadays. Reforming the building procedure through OSM is seen more of a challenge to the populaces ain positions than it is to the systems environing sustainability ( Ireland, B. & A ; Turnball, D. 2006 ) .

There is an ever-growing population in the UK, particularly within urban countries. The demand for lodging presently outweighs the concurrent supply and the pressing demand for excess development is evermore pressing. At present, the expected alterations in human ecology of population are projecting a demand for 4.5 million new places in the following 10 old ages ( Barker, K. 2003 ) . However, during such tough economic times, the feasibleness of fiting the demand with current economic resources is improbable to run into the development rates required.

This is where OSM is sold as the reply to all of the building industries jobs ( Kelly, R. 1998 ) .

Many inquiry OSM ‘s ability to salve the lodging market but there are strong counter-arguments for following its method due to its benefits in footings of production, efficiency, quality and sustainability ( Ireland, B. & A ; Turnball, D. 2006 ) .

The environmental impact of lodging is going an progressively of import consideration for developers and factors such as ; pick of stuffs, method of building, its business, life-span and what happens after its life are all the cardinal elements that OSM tries to let for in its sustainable attack to mass production ( ModuleCo 2010 ) .

An estimated 10 % of all edifice stuffs that are delivered to site for the usage of traditional building travel to blow through non being used ( McMullan, R. 2002 ) . This is an highly big per centum of waste that is lending to the industries un-sustainable end product ; the rate to which this can be avoided without drastic alterations being put in topographic point is comparatively unforeseeable due to its market germinating around a non-static data point. The volatility of this waste addition is spread outing due to greater steps of sustainable control and waste decrease ( across all markets ) ( Riley, M. & A ; Howard, C. 2002 ) .

OSM techniques environing the usage of more efficient stuffs and supply concatenation direction will besides help a far less uneconomical building procedure ( Riley, M. & A ; Cotgrave, A. 2008 ) .

The increased usage of OSM promises to decrease such deductions through greater accent on the procedure and whole-life public presentation of lodging. This can be achieved through enhanced specification criterions and build quality to relieve term of offices related to energy usage, defects and fixs ( Davis Langdon & A ; Everest, 2004 ) .

Egan ‘s study “ Rethinking Construction ” ( 1998 ) called for a more standardized procedure and off-site pre-testing to advance a simple repetition construction in quality built lodging ( Egan, J. 1998 ) .

Due to tight quality control tolerances required by mill mass or/and batch production ( UNFCCC 2009 ) , the environmental public presentation of OSM lodging is significantly improved through greater energy efficiency with respects to higher degrees of air stringency ( infiltration ) therefore increasing thermic public presentation of the edifice ( ModuleCo 2010 ) . The lower running costs that are hence adopted in bend release less C emanations. With the authorities scheme for all new physiques lodging to be zero-carbon by 2016 ( DCLG 2007 ) , the acceptance of OSM could be seen as a chief participant for accomplishing such program.

This besides complies with PPS1 ( Planing Policy Statement 1 ) 2005 of which sets out the authoritiess overarching be aftering policies on the bringing of sustainable development through the planning system ( DCLG 2005 ) .

The increased usage of vehicles that would be required to pick up and present stuffs would look to equilibrate out the decrease in on-site emanations if OSM were to be used. However, ‘ModuleCo ‘ say “ one time the edifice has been delivered to site, a decreased figure of vehicular visits is required ( compared to traditional methods of building ) , thereby doing less environmental impact on site ” ( ModuleCo 2010 ) .

Any local environment perturbation such as noise pollution, dust and general on-site nuisances that would hold occurred during traditional building is besides eliminated ( Myers, D. 2008 ) .

OSM houses can be genuinely sustainable edifices and can be reconfigured to run into the changing demands of the end-user. Throughout the lifecycle of the edifice, constituents such as floor layouts, proviso for services and divider assembly can be reconfigured to suit the householders demands. This increased flexibleness allows for pre and post-site refits without the clip consummation and cost that is required with traditional building ( ModuleCo 2010 ) .

The edifice life of OSM lodging is technically eternal as the stuffs used in its fiction can be removed or repaired ( more likely to be removed ) and merely replaced with a pre-fabricated constituent of the same nature ( Womack, J.P. & A ; Jones, D.T. 2001 ) . Any changes or amendments that are desired are normally accommodated for by OSM developers so that when necessary, refitting and recycling the edifice provides an environmentally friendly, truly sustainable solution that is future cogent evidence ( Kelly, R. 1998 ) .

Most constituents of OSM lodging are to the full reclaimable and hence can be re-used even in a different signifier and for a different intent ( Taylor, G.D. 2002 ) .

The gait of development in OSM is increasing with bing participants adding capacity and new participants come ining the market such as Laing O’Rourke and Corus ( Davis Langdon & A ; Everest, 2004 ) .

In Europe, IKEA have already teamed up with Skanska to make the OSM lodging construct ‘Boklok ‘ which means ‘Live Smart ‘ in Swedish ( Slavin, T. 2001 ) .

Its design evolves around supplying an optimal “ space-saving, functional and high quality lodging at a monetary value that enables every bit many people as possible to afford a fashionable and comfy place ” ( Boklok 2010 ) .

Figure 3 ( below ) demonstrates an alive image of the internal envelope of a typical equipped Boklok house.

Figure 3 Beginning: Instablog Images ( 2010 )

It has already evolved to presently make markets in 5 different states: Sweden, Great Britain, Finland, Norway and Denmark ( Boklok 2010 ) .

Recent undertakings in the UK include one and two sleeping room flats in St James, Gateshead ( pictured below ; Figures 4 and 5 ) .


Figure 4 Beginning: Boklok ‘b ‘ ( 2010 )


Figure 5 Beginning: Boklok ‘b ‘ ( 2010 )

In the UK, there has been already a reasonably important rise in OSM execution and big developers seem eager to accommodate to the construct to widen and foster their market pitch ( Ireland, B. & A ; Turnball, D. 2006 ) .

Redrow are already in the procedure of seeking to pull 1st clip purchasers with their latest construct, the new OSM ?55k house ( Figure 6, below-left on following page ) ( BBC, 2005 ) .

It was sited in Wales and its frame was erected out of chiefly steel. The foundations were the lone component required to be formed on-site. In regard of smaller designs such as 1-bedroom flats, the existent physique clip was a mere 3 hebdomads. However, it was noted that for a similar merchandise utilizing traditional methods of building, the OSM house really cost somewhat more ( BBC, 2005 ) .

A digital image of the complete undertaking

Figure 6 Beginning: BBC ( 2005 )

Their latest invention has been repeated in Rugby, where monetary values start at a mere ?50k ( Building, 2008 ) . Figure 7 ( below ) shows an illustration of one of the completed endeavors.

Figure 7 Beginning: Building ( 2008 )

At present, there is a existent demand to kick-start the lodging industry that will conform to the sustainable issues presently being addressed, the inquiry is, is OSM the manner to make it?

With a limited array of new signifiers of lodging that conform to the whole ‘sustainable development ‘ , OSM appears to most surely tick a bulk if non all of the boxes branched from it. Its execution has already spread outing to an extent that it could be defined as “ development that meets the demands of the present without compromising the ability of future coevalss to run into their ain demands ” ( Brundtland, G. 1987 ) , of which is a existent case in point set by many states in the universe to adhere us all together in one common impression.

The general consensus is that the UK building industry needs to put more into research and development ( R & A ; D ) if OSM is to win as it has in states such as Japan ( UNFCCC, 2009 ) . Approximately 20 % of Japans lodging is pre-fabricated and their several investings in R & A ; D have allowed them to use OSM as such a big part of the market sector ( Ohtake, F. & A ; Shintani, M. 1995 ) . To distinguish the graduated tables in which Japan and the UK operate is exemplified with the recent statistic that Japans taking lodging developer invests more into R & A ; D than the full UK edifice research budget ( Justlanded 2010 ) .

However, it needs to be borne in head that where and how OSM is enhanced dramas an highly of import function in the long term success of the construct. Careful analysis is needed to guarantee that a repetition of pre-fabricated lodging like in some parts of eastern Europe is avoided to forestall the formation of ‘slums ‘ , therefore weakening the publicity of sustainable communities through a sustainable signifier of building ( NHF 1997 ) .

If OSM is successful and the portion in the market it possesses expands, the ability for developers to run on minimal capacity due to pre-fabrication of merchandises in factory-controlled conditions ( Myers, D. 2008 ) will convey possible jobs to the concern stakeholders. The more than probably ensuing redundancies or cut-backs of work forces begs a hard yet needed inquiry, do we desire to be let go ofing employees into a clime where unemployment is already high?

It is slightly niche in its sustainable end product as it is hard to to the full specify as being either sacrificial to the people at present or the future coevalss.

Although the usage of simple pre-fabricated constituents has increased in most sectors in the industry, the indorsement for excess incorporate OSM systems has been more mutable ( Davis Langdon & A ; Everest, 2004 ) .

Without raised consciousness and a alteration in attitudes towards sustainable lodging as a whole, its version to the private lodging edifice industry will be unsure as the “ premium building costs of OSM are hard to warrant in a market focused on location and monetary value instead than quality and life-time public presentation ” ( Davis Langdon & A ; Everest 2004 ) .