Activity Based bing system received significant attending by accounting research workers, ABC holding been studied from a broad scope of position. this include the drivers of acceptance ( Anderson, 1995 ; Anderson and immature, 1999 ; Al-Omiri and Drury, 2007 ) , factors associated with successful execution ( shields, 1995 ; Foster and Swenson, 1997 ; Mcgowan and Klammer, 1997 ; Al-Omiri and Drury, 2007 ; Abdul Majid and Sulaiman 2008 ) and benefits that have been associated with ABC acceptance ( Kennedy and Graves, 2001 ; Cagwin and Bouwman, 2002 ; Cohen et al. 2005, Sartorius et Al. 2007 ) . The rise of ABC acceptance has been linked to the betterment engineering and strong competition which make traditional costing system unable to find accurate costs of merchandises and services. ( Dapper 1991 )
legion surveies criticize traditional cost accounting systems because it is adhere to the premise that merchandise causes cost ( Green and Flentov 1995 ) , while Cooper ( 1988 ) and Derya ( 1996 ) stated that it is frequently allocate costs based on single-volume steps such as direct-labor costs, or machine hours, and they argued this does do incorrect in finding some type of cost, besides Gunasekaran, ( 1999 ) added that traditional cost system does non give accurate step for activity public presentation and the studies do non give us any information about the value -adding activities.
However the surveies on activity based costing system ( ABC ) still takes a cardinal topographic point in the accounting surveies, since the early empirical survey of Cooper and Zmud ( 1990 ) to analyze whether certain factors affect execution phase otherwise, research workers have developed different interpretive position to cognize and foreground the factors act uponing to ABC acceptance and execution ( shield, 1995 ; Maelah and Ibrahim 2006 ; Malami, 1999 ; Swenson, 1995 ) or the phase of it is application procedures ( Anderson, 1995 ; Gosselin, 1997 ; Krumwiede 1998 ; Brown et Al. 2004 ) , but most of these surveies arrived to equivocal, different and divergent consequences, Because the term “ execution ” has been capable to different readings with some surveies specifying it as “ existent ABC execution ” and others specifying it as “ dwelling of either existent execution or a desire to implement it ( Sartorius et al. 2007 ) Furthermore, the footing for comparings of factors act uponing the execution of ABC have differed with some surveies comparing those companies that have considered the execution of ABC ( have shown involvement ) with those that do non sing the execution of ABC ( have shown no involvement ) in ABC. Furthermore, the extent of the ABC execution in a scope of different states varies widely: some states report increasing in the acceptance rate of ABC and other states report the exact contrary. Besides the research workers in the same state have reported widely different consequences ( Baird et al. , 2004 ; 2007 ; Brown et al. , 2004 ; Booth and Giacobbe, 1997 ) . It is, hence, hard, to compare the consequences from the assorted surveies, peculiarly associating to usage rates or ability of factors to know apart between implementers and non-implementers when the term “ execution ” have been capable to different definitions ( Al-Omiri and Drury, 2007 ) .
The literatures shows different positions to the factors that act uponing to activity based bing system shields ( 1995 ) found success to be strongly linked with behavioural and organisational variables, but non to proficient variable, Anderson ( 1995 ) argued that the factors influence execution are context specific.Anderson concluded that the extent to which specific organisation and proficient factors, single and undertaking features, and environmental factors influence execution success vary across the phase of execution Krumwied, ( 1998 ) found that the different factors affected the assorted phases of ABC acceptance and execution and grade of importance of each factors varies harmonizing to the phase of execution. He concludes that houses sing or implementing the ABC system should take organisation and contextual factors into history.
( Anderson 2002 ; Arnaboldi and Lapsley 2005 ; Abdul Majid and Sulaiman 2008 ) argued that the proficient factors was neglected in the old surveies, so they segmented the acceptance and execution of ABC to phases, they suggested the demand for more research in this factors to cognize how this factors or proficient troubles encountered during the execution of ABC system, besides Numerous surveies stated that there is a demand to section the phase of ABC acceptance when researching success by analyzing sites at ABC adulthood, the consequence of ABC execution may be achieved after the utilizing phase specially the betterment in fiscal public presentation, Previous literature such as ( Baird et al, 2004 ; Krumwiede, 1998 ; Gosselin, 1997 ) have been figure of surveies that have segmented the ABC execution to phases and the figure of phases was different between the different research workers as his research inquiry in the survey demand. More by and large, this should be a consideration for any survey analyzing a new system execution, so in the current survey the research worker will section the acceptance and execution of ABC to present this phases, are non-consideration, consideration, acceptance, execution and usage phase.
The old surveies such as Shields, ( 1995 ) ; Brown et Al. ( 2004 ) ; Cohen et Al. ( 2005 ) ; Baird et Al. ( 2007 ) ; Al-Omiri and Drury, ( 2007 ) examined the factors set uping to the determination to follow and implement ABC without separating between the industrial and fiscal sectors or between Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing industries in which ABC has been adopted. Clarke et Al. ( 1999 ) suggested that, it is of import to separate between the types of sector because the non-manufacturing companies are a much more heterogenous group ( Clarke et al. , 1999 ) . For case, educational services are different from bank services, which are different from health care services or insurance. In peculiar, the old surveies such as Shields, ( 1995 ) ; Brown et Al. ( 2004 ) ; Cohen et Al. ( 2005 ) ; Baird et Al. ( 2007 ) examined the factors that influence the determination to follow and implement ABC. They used a broad scope of different house sectors. Therefore, it is sometimes hard to construe the consequences ( Clarke et al. , 1999 ) . For illustration, information refering the relationship between company features and ABC acceptance may be concealed by sector-related market and technological fortunes. As has been shown by Clarke et Al. ( 1999 ) , acceptance rates every bit good as grounds for acceptance or rejection of ABC may differ significantly between industry groups ( fabricating and non-manufacturing ) . As a consequence, the current survey focuses on a more homogenous group of companies. Consequently, merely fabricating companies will be examined in the current survey.
Another observation about the of import of separating between the different sectors shows by many research worker such as, Clarke et Al. ( 1999 ) Drury and Tayles ( 2005 ) and Al-Omiri and Drury ( 2007 ) they argued that the cost constructions of fabrication companies are different from those of non-manufacturing and fiscal companies. For illustration, in Non-manufacturing companies, the direct labor costs and stuff costs are really small, this mean that fixed operating expense costs are really high and this will increase the proportion of entire costs. This may take to non-manufacturing companies being more likely than fabricating companies to follow and implement ABC. For illustration, Innes et Al. ( 2000 ) reported that, the fiscal sector which had the highest degree ( 40.7 % ) of acceptance of the ABC system, whereas, merely 14.3 % of fabrication and 12.1 % o f non-manufacturing companies used this system. so, the bulk of surveies analyzing ABC have been conducted in the industrial sectors where the grounds for following and implementing ABC are non clear ( Anderson, 1995 ; Swenson, 1995 ; Clarke et al. , 1999 ; Krumwiede, 1998 ; Bjornenak, 1997 ; Gosselin, 1997 ) .
From the above treatment it can be seen that the Jordanian fabrication companies will be a chief beginning of informations and population for this survey, by utilizing suited assorted method because the Previous surveies such as Brown et Al. ( 2004 ) ; Krumwiede ( 1998 ) ; Cohen et Al. ( 2005 ) ; Baird et Al. ( 2007 ) ; Al-Omiri and Drury ( 2007 ) used merely questionnaire study in their surveies. They allowed the respondent to self-specify whether his/her company used ( operated ) an ABC system or non. ( Krumwiede 1998 ; Al-Omiri and Drury 2007 ) suggested that surveies used merely questionnaire study reported a mistaken, exaggerated or equivocal consequences, and do non supply grounds that companies said that they ABC adoptive parents are truly they are ABC adoptive parents.
In the current research assorted informations aggregation methods will utilize. First, questionnaire study will plan by include suited control inquiries that allow the research worker to look into respondents ‘ claims that their houses are runing ABC systems are truly ABC adoptive parent or operators. Second, face-to-face interviews will carry on with adoptive parents houses for farther elucidation and accounts about ABC system. Therefore, the current survey will be able to corroborate if the respondents those claiming that they use ABC they really ABC users.
This survey focuses on Jordan because it is the place state of the research worker and he can supply a comprehensive image of ABC diffusion and factors act uponing on the procedure of following and implementing ABC in this little figure of fabricating companies. This sector was chosen because harmonizing to the Ministry of Planning ( 2007 ) there is a clear tendency in the societal and economic development programs of consecutive Jordanian authoritiess to back up the industrial sector.
1.2. Problem statement
Many industrial houses have shifted from labour intensive to machine intensive in production, this has resulted increase in the overhead cost. Which need accurate allotment to the merchandises so, many houses have shifted from traditional cost accounting to more suitable system to account the operating expense cost accurately. ABC system provides more accurate operating expense cost allotment. ( Innes and Mitchell 1995 )
Many faculty members and practicians are considered Activity-based costing ( ABC ) as one of the most of import invention in direction accounting of the twentieth century ( Kaplan and Anderson, 2007 ; Askarany and Yazdifar, 2007 Abdel-Kader and Luther, 2008 ) . In add-on, the consequences of these surveies indicate that directors perceive the utility of cost information provided by the ABC system to be higher than the volume based costing ( shield 1995 ; Mcgowan and Klammer 1997 ; Kruemwield 1998 ; Baird et al. , 2007 and Cohen et al. , 2005 ) indicate that most of directors and users ( employees ) are satisfied with the execution of ABC, because ABC system has been found as an suitable method of apportioning overhead costs, measuring merchandise profitableness and managing operating costs.
However, Although many advantage to the activity based bing system acceptance rates revealed by surveies show that companies pattern of ABC have been lower than has been expected, ( Omar 2007 ) For case, a figure of studies have pointed out that ABC is implemented merely by between 20 % and 30 % of companies ( Innes and Mitchell, 1995 ; and Innes et al. , 2000 ; Kaplan and Anderson, 2004 ; Askarany and Smith, 2008 ) , another surveies such as ( Chung et al 1990 ; Arnaboldi and Lapsley 2003 ) revealed that many companies that adopt ABC were still at the early phase of ABC execution, and most of the efforts to implementing it produce merely a partial model for explicating the whole flight of ABC development or ended in the narrow application of ABC in fringy services or in fresh systems, whereas TCS continues to be really implemented a great trade ( Innes et al. , 2000 ; Al-Omiri and Drury, 2007 ; Askarany and Smith, 2008 ) . This has led to the basic inquiry of why direction accounting inventions have been slow to alter despite the quickly altering organizational and technological environment during the last two decennaries.
Several recent surveies have started to turn to this issue by sing the acceptance rate of ABC, the grounds for implementing ABC, the jobs associated with ABC and the critical success factors associating to its successful execution ( Gosselin, 2007 ; Kaplan and Anderson, 2007 ; Askarany and Smith, 2008 ) . One ground could be that ABC adoptive parents have found it non successful in presenting expected net benefits. If ABC adoptive parents have found it non successful, so that could construe the low acceptance rates ( Kennedy and Bull ; 2000Drury & A ; Tayles 2005 ) . However, the empirical grounds from ABC research is debatable. First, the extent of the ABC execution in a scope of different states varies widely: some states report an addition in the usage of ABC and other states report the exact contrary. Besides the research workers in the same state have reported widely different consequences about the acceptance rate ( Baird et al. , 2004 ; 2007 ; Brown et al. , 2004 ; Booth and Giacobbe, 1997 ) . Assorted possible grounds have been suggested for this comparatively low acceptance rate, which include the undermentioned: Technical Variables such as identifying and aggregating activities, delegating resources to activities, choosing cost drivers ( Innes and Mitchell 1995 ; Clarke et Al. 1999 ; Groot, 1999 ; Innes et Al. 2000 ; Chongruksut 2002 ; Pierce and Brown 2004 ; and Cohen et Al. 2005, Sartorius et Al. 2007 ) , Behavioral and Organisational variables such as internal opposition, deficiency of top direction support, human resource handiness, deficiency of cognition, and an uttered satisfaction with current systems ( Anderson 1995 ; Shields 1995 ; Clarke et Al. 1999 ; Innes et Al. 2000 ; Chongruksut 2002 ; Pierce and Brown 2004 ; Cohen et al. 2005 ; and Abdul Majid and Sulaiman, ( 2008 ) , and Systems Issues, such as informations aggregation troubles, unequal computing machine package, sum of work and clip needed ( Clarke et al. 1999 ; Innes et Al. 2000 ; and Pierce and Brown 2004 ) . Second, the grounds for implementing ABC, the barriers to ABC execution and critical success factors appear to differ widely between different research workers ( Brown et al. , 2004 ) , since they frequently measure success in different ways ( Swenson, 1995 ; Cohen et al. , 2005 ; Baird et al. , 2007 ) . Therefore, In position of these equivocal findings, the same issues need to be investigated further in the Jordanian industrial sector where so far small is known about the extent of ABC acceptance and execution and those factors motivate, facilitate and create barriers to execution ( Al-Khadash and Feridun, 2006 ) .
1.3. Research Aim and Aims
The purpose of the current research is to cognize barriers and jobs of ABC execution in the Jordanian industrial sector and the factors that motivate and facilitate execution of activity based bing systems, by replying the research inquiries. In add-on, the current survey intends to accomplish the undermentioned bomber aims:
To analyze the extent of ABC execution system within the Jordanian industrial sector.
To place the grounds for Non-considered ABC system.
To find factors that impact against ABC execution.
To find the factors that have facilitate the procedure to implement ABC system.
To find the chief factors that have motivated the execution of ABC system.
To place the jobs faced ABC execution.
To determine the positions of the users companies on the grade of success of ABC system and promote who do non utilizing ABC to utilize it.
Examine if their significance differences between ABC users and non-users based on company features.
1.4 Research Questions
To accomplish the above purpose and aims, the current survey will seek replies the undermentioned research inquiries:
What is the current province of ABC execution among the Jordanian industrial companies?
For companies that are Not-considering utilizing ABC, what are the chief grounds for non sing it?
For companies that are Considering/Adopting ABC, what are the chief factors against ABC execution?
For companies that are presently Implementing/Using ABC, what are the chief factors that facilitate its execution?
For companies that are presently Implementing/Using ABC, what are the chief factors that motivate its execution?
For companies that are presently Implementing/Using ABC, what are the chief barriers to ABC execution that the companies have encountered?
For companies that are presently Using ABC, what is the grade of ABC success?
Is there any significance differences between ABC users and non-users based on company features?
1.5 Significance of the survey
Significance of this survey stems from the fact that it is surveies the ABC system in industrial sectors in Jordan, which need to happen a new method to cut down costs in the new environment, ( Kasharmeh 2002 ) This suggests that it may be a good thought for ABC to be more extensively adopted in Jordan, The first part of this survey will enable to cognize the extent of ABC within the Jordanian fabrication sector by section ABC acceptance and execution to different phases. Most old surveies focused merely on the execution of ABC in western developed states such as Ireland ( Clark et al. 1999 ; Pierce and Brown 2004 ) , UK ( Innes and Mitchell 1991, 1995 ; and Innes et Al. 2000 ) , USA ( Anderson 1995 ; Groot 1999 ) Australia ( Booth and Giacobbe, 1997, Nguyen and Brooks 1997 ; Brown et Al. 2004 ) and New Zealand ( Cotton et al, 2003 ) . The consequences of this survey make a part to bing cognition in the country of the execution of ABC, particularly in eastern developing states like Jordan and determined the factors that motivate, facilitate and create barriers to ABC execution.
The 2nd part of this survey is developed a conceptual theoretical account of ABC execution in fabrication houses. It allows for the development of a more sophisticated apprehension concerned with the factors motivate, facilitate and create barriers to ABC execution based in an eastern developing state position, besides it contributes in cutting off assorted issues about the factors influence to activity based bing execution which is assorted issue between the research worker.
Finally, Most of the old surveies have allowed to the respondents to self-rating if their company utilizing ABC or no. In this survey several control inquiries were included in questionnaire to look into the respondent ‘ claims that they were runing ABC system is truly ABC users. In add-on, semi-structure interviews will carry on with four companies for farther account, supplementation and discover of new factors may act upon to ABC acceptance and execution. Therefore, compared with old surveies, there is a much higher chance with this survey that those respondents claiming to utilize ABC were really ABC users.
Organization of the survey
This survey will incorporate from sex chapters. In chapter one will reason the debut of the survey, including the background and job statement, aims of the survey, research inquiries important of the survey. Chapter 2 will include the literature reappraisal which organized by major surveies which related to the job and described above. Chapter 3 will depict the research methodological analysis selected to work out the job statement. Chapter 4 will demo the study analysis.chapter 5 will demo a instance survey analysis. Chapter 6 will sum up the decisions and parts of the research besides will turn to the restrictions, and nowadayss deductions for future research.
Al-Khadash, H. and Feridun, M. ( 2006 ) , “ Impact of Strategic Initiatives in Management Accounting on Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from Amman Stock Exchange ” , Pull offing Global Transitions, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 299 -313.
Al-Omiri, M. and Drury, C. ( 2007 ) , “ A study of factors act uponing the pick of merchandise bing systems in UK organisations ” , Management Accounting Research in Press, Corrected Proof, ( doi:10.1016/j.mar.2007.02.002 )
Anderson, S. ( 1995 ) , “ A Framework for Measuring Cost Management System Changes: The Case of Activity-Based Costing Implementation at General Motors, 1986-1993 ” , Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 7, Fall, pp.1-51.
Askarany and yazdifar. ( 2007 ) , ” why ABC is non widely implementing, international diary of Business research,2007
Atkinson, A. Balakrishnan, R. Booth, P. Cote, J. Groot, T. Malmi, T. Roberts, H. Uliana, E. and Wu, A. ( 1997 ) , “ New Directions in Management Accounting Research ” , Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 9, pp.79-108
Abdul Majid, j. and Sulaiman, m. ( 2008 ) execution of activity based costing in Malaysia, Asian Review of accounting, Vol.16.1, pp. 39-55.
Arnaboldi, M. and Lapsley, I. ( 2005 ) . Activity based costing in health care: A UK instance Study. Research in health care finance direction, vol. 10 No.1, pp.61-75.
Baird, K. Harrison, G. and Reeve, R. ( 2004 ) , “ Adoption of activity direction patterns: a note on the extent of acceptance and the influence of organisational and cultural factors ” , Management Accounting Research, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp, 383-399.
Baird, K. Harrison, G. and Reeve, R. ( 2007 ) , ” Success of activity direction patterns: the influence of organisational and cultural factors ” , Accounting and Finance, Vol. 47, pp. 47-67.
Booth, P. and Giacobbe, F. ( 1997 ) , “ Activity-Based Costing in Australia Fabrication houses: Key Survey Findings ” , Management Accounting Issues Report by the Management Accounting Centre of Excellence of ASCPA, No.5, March 1997, pp.1-6.
Bright J. Davies, C. Downes R. and Sweeting, C. ( 1992 ) , “ The deployment of Costing Techniques and Practices: a UK Study ” . Management Accounting Research, Vol. 3, pp 201-211.
Brown, D. Booth, P. and Giacobbe, F. ( 2004 ) , “ Technological and organisational influences on the acceptance of activity-based costing in Australia ” , Accounting and finance, Vol. 44, pp. 329-356
Brown, R. ( 2004 ) , “ An empirical survey of activity-based bing systems in Ireland ” , The Irish Accounting Review, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 33-55
Chen, G. Firth, M. and Park, K. ( 2001 ) , “ The Implementation of Benefits of Activity-Based Costing: A Hong Kong Study ” , Asia Review of Accounting, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp.23-37.
Clarke, P. , Hill, N. , and Stevens, K. ( 1999 ) , “ Activity-based costing in Ireland: barriers to and chances for alteration ” . Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 10, 443-468.
Cobb, I. Innes, J. and Mitchell, F. ( 1992 ) , Activity Based Costing: Problems in Practice, CIMA London.
Cohen, S. Venieris, G. and Kaimenaki, E. ( 2005 ) , “ ABC: adoptive parents, protagonists, deniers and unawares ” , Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 20 No. 9, pp. 981-1001.
Cooper, R. and Zmud, R. ( 1990 ) , “ Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach ” , Management Science, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 123-139.
Cotton, W. Jackman, S. and Brown, E. ( 2003 ) , “ Note on a New Zealand Replication of the Innes et Al. UK Activity-based costing study ” , Management Accounting Research, Vol. 14 No 1, pp. 67-72,
Foster, G. and Swenson, D. ( 1997 ) , “ Measuring the Success of Activity-Based Costing Management and Its Determinants ” , Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 9, pp.109-141.
Gosselin, M. ( 1997 ) , “ The Effect of Strategy and Organisational Structure on the Adoption and Implementation of Activity-Based Costing ” , Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 22 No 2, pp.105-122
Chongruksut, W. , ( 2002 ) . The Adoption of activity-based costing in Thailand, Victoria university, Thailand 671.
Innes, J. and Mitchell, F. ( 1995 ) , “ A Survey of Activity-based Costing in the UK ‘s Largest Companies ” , Management Accounting Research, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp.137-153
Innes, J. Mitchell, F. and Sinclair, D. ( 2000 ) , “ Activity-Based Costing in the UK ‘s Largest Companies: A Comparison of 1994 and 1999 Survey Results ” , Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 349-362.
Khasharmeh, H. 2002. Activity-based costing in Jordanian fabrication companies. Administrative Sciences 29 ( 1 ) : 213-27.
Krumwiede, K. ( 1998 ) , “ The Implementation Stages of Activity-Based Costing and The Impact of Contextual and Organisational Factors ” , Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp.239-277.
Malmi, T. ( 1997 ) , “ Towards explicating activity-based costing failure: accounting and control in a decentralised organisation ” , Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8, pp. 459-480.
McGowan, A. and Klammer, T. ( 1997 ) , “ Satisfaction with Activity-Based Costing Management Implementation ” , Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 9, pp.217-237
Ministry of Planning Report, the Economic indexs 2007, Amman, Jordan, 2007
Pierce, B. and Brown, B. ( 2004 ) , “ An empirical survey of Activity-based bing systems in Ireland ” , The Irish Accounting Review. Vol. 11 No.1, pp, 33-55.
Sartorius, K. and Eitzen, C. ( 2007 ) , “ The design and execution of Activity Based Costing ( ABC ) : a South African study ” , Meditari Accountancy Research. Vol.15 No.2, pp 1-21.
Shields, M. ( 1995 ) , “ An Empirical Analysis of Firms: Execution Experiences with Activity-Based Costing ” , Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 7, pp.148-164.
Swenson, D. ( 1995 ) , ” The Benefits of Activity-Based Costing Management to the Fabrication Industry ” , Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 7, pp.167-180.